2011
DOI: 10.1080/10570314.2011.608407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ambiguous Divorce-Related Communication, Relational Closeness, Relational Satisfaction, and Communication Satisfaction

Abstract: Using Communication Privacy Management theory, the study argues parents' ambiguity during divorce-related stressor conversations influence parents' and young adult children's relational closeness, satisfaction, and communication satisfaction. Thirty-nine parent-young adult child dyads discussed a divorce-related stressor and reported their thoughts. Hierarchical regression models indicated children's perceptions of parents' ambiguity predicted lower communication satisfaction; however, parents' use of ambiguit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, based on family systems theory, each dimension has the potential to influence children's well‐being by shaping family dynamics after parental divorce. For example, boundary ambiguity between divorced parents may create a family system that is less predictable for children, increase children's exposure to interparental conflict, or lead to parents making inappropriate disclosures to children (Afifi et al, 2006; DiVerniero, 2013; McManus & Nussbaum, 2011; Schrodt & Afifi, 2018). Depending on its content, quality, and frequency, general communication (i.e., communication unrelated to children or childrearing responsibilities) between former spouses carries the potential to benefit or undermine children's well‐being (Herrero et al, 2020).…”
Section: Family Systems Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, based on family systems theory, each dimension has the potential to influence children's well‐being by shaping family dynamics after parental divorce. For example, boundary ambiguity between divorced parents may create a family system that is less predictable for children, increase children's exposure to interparental conflict, or lead to parents making inappropriate disclosures to children (Afifi et al, 2006; DiVerniero, 2013; McManus & Nussbaum, 2011; Schrodt & Afifi, 2018). Depending on its content, quality, and frequency, general communication (i.e., communication unrelated to children or childrearing responsibilities) between former spouses carries the potential to benefit or undermine children's well‐being (Herrero et al, 2020).…”
Section: Family Systems Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a parent may use ambiguity when privacy protection rules suggest some information should be disclosed although specific details may not be necessary. Indeed, parents reported using ambiguity when discussing divorce-related stress with emerging adult children; however, it was unrelated to parents' closeness or relational satisfaction (McManus & Nussbaum, 2011a).…”
Section: Topic Valence and Ambiguity 197mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the meaning children infer may vary significantly or only slightly from a parents' intended message. Although emerging adult children perceived parents' ambiguity in divorce-related stressor communication (McManus & Nussbaum, 2011a), its impact on relational satisfaction and psychological well-being is unclear. Emerging adult children's perceptions of parents' ambiguity was not associated with relational satisfaction and relational closeness in one study (McManus & Nussbaum, 2011b).…”
Section: Topic Valence and Ambiguity 197mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Practically, communication satisfaction is important for adult children and their parents. Children's communication satisfaction has been positively associated with both their own and their parent's relational satisfaction (McManus & Nussbaum, 2011). When parents and children are satisfied with their communication, they maintain their relationships in prosocial ways (e.g., provide assurances to one another, manage conflict constructively; Punyanunt-Carter, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%