1972
DOI: 10.1139/y72-160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ambivalence in Rate Using Single-Lever Skinner Boxes

Abstract: Ambivalent behavior or ambivalence in rats was observed in a single-lever Skinner box situation. The behavioral features associated with ambivalence were filmed and described, and their intensities were graded. It was found that different behavioral patterns, depending on the site of stimulation, are involved in ambivalence. Moreover, the intensity of self-stimulation and withdrawal was found to be higher in subjects implanted in posterior brain areas than in rats implanted in anterior areas, suggesting the ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1974
1974
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A direct preference test was performed in our experiment by having the rats choose between LH and VMT electrical stimulation. The interest in putting into competition these two areas was based on (1) the multiple similarities on the criterion of bar-pressing rates (Bruner, 1967;Dresse, 1965Dresse, , 1967Miliaressis, 1972;Olds, 1959;Olds & Olds, 1963;Roberts, 1958;St-Laurent & Beaugrand, 1972) and (2) the differences observed concerning the regulation of food (Anand & Brobeck, 1951;Margules & Olds, 1962;Miliaressis & Cardo, 1973;Mount & Hoebel, 1967) and epileptiform activity (Bogatz et al, 1965;Herberg & Blundell, 1969).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A direct preference test was performed in our experiment by having the rats choose between LH and VMT electrical stimulation. The interest in putting into competition these two areas was based on (1) the multiple similarities on the criterion of bar-pressing rates (Bruner, 1967;Dresse, 1965Dresse, , 1967Miliaressis, 1972;Olds, 1959;Olds & Olds, 1963;Roberts, 1958;St-Laurent & Beaugrand, 1972) and (2) the differences observed concerning the regulation of food (Anand & Brobeck, 1951;Margules & Olds, 1962;Miliaressis & Cardo, 1973;Mount & Hoebel, 1967) and epileptiform activity (Bogatz et al, 1965;Herberg & Blundell, 1969).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%