2020
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.18752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ambulatory Health Care Service Use and Costs Among Commercially Insured US Adults With Congenital Heart Disease

Abstract: Author Contributions: Drs Agarwal and Vittinghoff had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…108 Among adults with commercially purchased insurance, those with CCDs had more health care visits and higher expenditures than those without CCD, even when controlling for baseline characteristics and comorbidities. 109 …”
Section: Congenital Cardiovascular Defects and Kawasaki Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…108 Among adults with commercially purchased insurance, those with CCDs had more health care visits and higher expenditures than those without CCD, even when controlling for baseline characteristics and comorbidities. 109 …”
Section: Congenital Cardiovascular Defects and Kawasaki Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among adults with commercially purchased insurance, those with CCDs had more health care visits and higher expenditures than those without CCDs, even when controlling for baseline characteristics and comorbidities. 112…”
Section: Congenital Cardiovascular Defects and Kawasaki Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For patients with codes for >1 CHD diagnosis, we used the hierarchical algorithm proposed by Broberg et al 22 to designate 1 condition per patient as the principal CHD diagnosis. As described earlier, 13 , 22 , 23 , 24 we excluded ICD‐9 codes that have lower specificity for CHD, including atrial septal defect, bicuspid aortic valve, aortic stenosis, congenital mitral valve disease, anomalous coronary arteries, and unspecified congenital anomalies. The remaining patients with CHD were categorized using the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology anatomic classification 25 as (1) complex CHD, defined by the presence of Eisenmenger (for those with a concomitant CHD diagnosis code and pulmonary arterial hypertension), univentricular heart defects (including hypoplastic left heart syndrome), transposition of the great arteries, tetralogy of Fallot, truncus arteriosus, and endocardial cushion defects; (2) moderately complex CHD, defined by the presence of Ebstein anomaly, coarctation of aorta, anomalies of the pulmonary artery, anomalies of the pulmonary valve, anomalies of the tricuspid valve, unspecified septal defects, anomalies of the great vein, subaortic stenosis, and aortic anomalies; and (3) simple CHD, defined by the presence of ventricular septal defect and patent ductus arteriosus.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 9 , 12 Understanding the impact of insurance on these services is particularly important for adults with chronic childhood preexisting conditions like congenital heart disease (CHD), a vulnerable high‐cost population. 13 , 14 , 15 Knowledge about this can add evidence to inform national conversations about important policies such as Medicaid expansion and tangible influences of preventing or allowing denial of insurance for patients with preexisting conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%