Amenity Migration in the U.S. Sierra Nevada

Abstract

ABSTRACT. Since 1960 California's Sierra Nevada counties have ranked among the regions with the strongest relative population growth in the state. Reassessment of peripheral areas has been the main force driving population and settlement growth in the central Sierra Nevada of California and Nevada, termed “amenity migration” or “counterurbanization.” This study analyzes the impacts of amenity migrants—“urban refugees”—on socioeconomic conditions in high‐mountain regions. We define these regions as the “High Sierra,” comprising zones at elevations more than 1,800 meters above sea level. People who migrate to the High Sierra tend to be white and well educated, with considerable household earnings. Unlike the population in the foothills, these migrants are not senior citizens. Their demand for periodic or permanent residences has caused housing prices to increase enormously. As a result, a majority of homes are now priced well beyond the reach of local salaries, which may lead to potential conflict between locals and newcomers. The massive settlement expansion in high‐mountain areas requires a new approach to land‐use planning, one that takes functional regions into account. Therefore, it is expedient to reassess existing jurisdictional boundaries.

Intercity Rent Differentials in the U.S. Housing Market 2000: Understanding Rent Variations as a Sociological Phenomenon

“…Gilderbloom and Appelbaum (1988) found in earlier studies that rents in the South were generally lower and statistically significant from 1970 to 1980, controlling for everything else. We suspect that this association might have diminished by 2000 with the wider introduction of air conditioning, insulation, and energy efficiency standards (Browne, 2000; Loffler & Steinicke, 2007). On the other hand, rents still might lag behind because of intolerance toward minorities.…”

Emerging amenity landscapes: Invasive weeds and land subdivision in rural Australia

“…Exploration of the social and ecological effects of amenity migration -the movement of people to rural and rural/peri-urban areas due to their 'environmental quality and differentiated culture' (Moss, 2006b, p. 3) -is receiving increasing attention in research and policy arenas (e.g., Argent et al, 2007;Buxton et al, 2006;Loeffler and Steinicke, 2007;McGranahan, 1999;Moss, 2006a;Stewart, 2002). In Australia rural land subdivision and population growth in certain inland areas is connected in part to the migration of people from metropolitan to non-metropolitan areas (Buckley et al, 2006;Bunker and Houston, 2003;Burnley and Murphy, 2004).…”

International Migration, Self-employment and Restructuring through Tourism in Sparsely Populated Areas

“…Not least, new mobility patterns through global tourism systems affect sparsely populated areas (Lasanta, Laguna, & Vicente-Serrano, 2007;Lundmark, 2006). Increasing possibilities to work and access to new labor markets also allow for in-migration into sparsely populated, amenity-rich areas (Loeffler & Steinicke, 2007). In this paper, the patterns of the "new mobilities" (Hannam, Sheller, & Urry 2006;Hedberg & do Carmo, 2012) focus on the changing tourism economies and prospects for tourism and regional development in rural and sparsely populated areas through in-migration and self-employment in tourism.…”