Objectives
Limited information exists on embolization for trauma patients regarding arteries embolized, embolic materials used, and embolization duration. We clarified the clinical application of embolization in trauma patients and factors associated with a prolonged procedure time.
Methods
Medical records of 162 trauma patients who underwent embolization between January 2007 and December 2020 at a regional trauma care center were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were divided into six embolized body regions: cerebrovascular, chest, abdomen, pelvis, peripheral, and other. Patient demographics, trauma mechanism, physiology, trauma severity, embolization procedures, and 30-day mortality were examined. The primary outcome was identifying an embolized body region and arteries, and secondary outcome was procedure time.
Results
Embolization was mainly performed in pelvic fractures (n = 96, 59%) and abdominal organ injuries (n = 57, 35%) and extended to the chest (n = 17, 10%), cerebrovascular (n = 8, 4.9%), peripheral (n = 5, 3.1%), and other (n = 7, 4.3%) regions. Approximately 13% (n = 21) of patients underwent embolization in ≥2 regions. Embolization was more strictly performed in minor artery injuries, e.g. external iliac (n = 15, 16%) and lumbar artery (n = 22, 23%) branches in pelvic fractures, and inferior phrenic artery (n = 2, 3.5%) branches in liver injuries. Non-selective embolization for a pelvic fracture tended to show a shorter procedure time despite no statistically significant difference (p = 0.056). For a longer procedure time, the number of embolized arteries (R = 0.357) and embolized body regions (R = 0.428) correlated.
Conclusions
Embolizations for trauma patients extended to various trauma regions. In time-sensitive embolization, emergency interventional radiologists showed superior knowledge of expected embolizing arteries and factors associated with procedure time.