2002
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.178.6.1781335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

American College of Radiology White Paper on MR Safety

Abstract: here are potential risks in the MR environment not only for the patient, but also for the attending health care professionals, accompanying family members, and others who may find themselves in the magnetic fields of MR scanners, such as security or housekeeping personnel, firefighters, and police. The following is an updated report of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Blue Ribbon Panel on MR Safety, chaired by Emanuel Kanal, MD, FACR [1]. The panel originally met in November 2001 consisting of the follo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
125
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
125
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The lead had a length of 62 cm for all experiments, with an active tip area of 6 mm 2 and an active ring area of 36 mm 2 . Both the rectangular box and the humanshaped phantom were filled with a gel composed of the following materials (in percent, by weight): 2% hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC; commercial name Natrosol); 97.64% water; and 0.36% sodium chloride.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lead had a length of 62 cm for all experiments, with an active tip area of 6 mm 2 and an active ring area of 36 mm 2 . Both the rectangular box and the humanshaped phantom were filled with a gel composed of the following materials (in percent, by weight): 2% hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC; commercial name Natrosol); 97.64% water; and 0.36% sodium chloride.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (MRI) is now contraindicated for patients implanted with pacemakers (PMs) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6). The potential effects of MRI on PMs, ICDs, and other active implantable medical devices (AIMDs) include: force and torque effects (7,8); an undefined reedswitch state within the static magnetic field (9); the potential risk of heart stimulation and inappropriate pacing (10,11); and heating effects at the lead tip (12)(13)(14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The American College of Radiology white paper on MR safety published in 2002 states that ''Pregnant patients can be accepted to undergo MR images at any stage of pregnancy if, in the determination of a Level Two MR Personnel-designated attending radiologist, the riskbenefit ratio to the patient warrants that the study be performed.'' [13] However, because of the potential risk of MRI to the developing fetus and the current limitations of fetal MRI, it is prudent to wait until after the first trimester before performing fetal MRI. In fact, it is preferable to wait until at least gestational week 22 to minimize the difficulties created by the small size and excessive motion of younger fetuses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is equally important to acknowledge the limitations of MRI in terms of both diagnostic accuracy and safety. Patients with cardiac pacemakers and ferrous intracranial vascular clips are not candidates for MRI (68), and indeed MRI has been reported to cause death in such patients (69). The known hazards associated with flying ferromagnetic objects, internal prostheses, and wire or metal objects in contact with the skin of patients can be avoided by the routine implementation of mandatory screening questionnaires filled out by patients before each MRI examination.…”
Section: Consider Alternatives To Ctmentioning
confidence: 99%