American Contact Dermatitis Society Allergens of the Year 2000 to 2020

Militello, Michelle; Hu, Sophia; Laughter, Melissa R.; Dunnick, Cory A.

doi:10.1016/j.det.2020.02.011

Cited by 20 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…2) With regard to allergen exposure, according to a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 50,507 patients with NACDG data for 22 years ( Warshaw et al., 2020 ), 60.5% of NACDG allergens were sourced from personal care products. Other CD allergens mainly include adhesives, dyes, drugs, metals, and preservatives ( Militello et al., 2020 ). 3) According to the estimates of the American Contact Dermatitis Association, the recent COVID-19 pandemic will increase the incidence of hand irritant contact and allergic CD ( Rundle et al., 2020 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Global Burden, Incidence and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for Dermatitis: A Systematic Analysis Combined With Socioeconomic Development Status, 1990–2019

Bao

Zhou

et al. 2022

Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundDermatitis is an important global health problem that not only affects social interaction and physical and mental health but also causes economic burden. Health problems or distress caused by dermatitis may be easily overlooked, and relevant epidemiological data are limited. Therefore, a better understanding of the burden of dermatitis is necessary for developing global intervention strategies.MethodsAll data on dermatitis, including atopic dermatitis (AD), contact dermatitis (CD) and seborrhoeic dermatitis (SD), were obtained from the Global Burden of Disease 2019 (GBD2019) database. The extracted age-standardized incidence rates (ASIR) and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) rates (ASDR) data were analysed by stratification, including by sex, country or region, and sociodemographic index (SDI) indicators. Finally, we analysed the correlation between the global burden of dermatitis and socioeconomic development status.ResultsAccording to the GBD 2019 estimate, the ASIR and ASDR for the three major types of dermatitis in 2019 were 5244.3988 (95% CI 4551.7244–5979.3176) per 100,000 person-years and 131.6711 (95% CI 77.5876–206.8796) per 100,000 person-years. The ASIR and ASDR of atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis and seborrhoeic dermatitis are: Incidence (95%CI,per 100,000 person-years), 327.91 (312.76-343.67), 3066.04 (2405.38-3755.38), 1850.44 (1706.25- 1993.74); DALYs (95%CI, per 100,000 person-years), 99.69 (53.09-167.43), 28.06 (17.62-41.78), 3.93 (2.24-6.25). In addition, among the three dermatitis types, the greatest burden was associated with AD. According to the ASDR from 1990 to 2019, the burden of dermatitis has exhibited a slow downward trend in recent years. In 2019, the ASIR showed that the USA had the greatest burden, while the ASDR showed that Asian countries (such as Japan, Mongolia, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan) and some European countries (France, Estonia) had the greatest burden. According to SDI stratification and the three major dermatitis types, high ASIR and ASDR corresponded to high SDI areas (especially for AD).ConclusionThe burden of dermatitis is related to socioeconomic development status, especially for AD, which is positively correlated with the SDI. The results based on GBD2019 data are valuable for formulating policy, preventing and treating dermatitis and reducing the global burden of dermatitis.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Global Burden, Incidence and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for Dermatitis: A Systematic Analysis Combined With Socioeconomic Development Status, 1990–2019

Bao

Zhou

et al. 2022

Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…An analysis of the literature revealed the mounting reports of isobornyl acrylate (IBOA) allergy secondary to various medical devices, especially among patients with continuous glucose monitoring devices [17][18][19][20]. IBOA is an emerging source of acrylate allergy [12], which was named the "Contact Allergen of the Year" in 2020 by the American Contact Dermatitis Society [21].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Contact eczema induced by hybrid manicure. The role of acrylates as a causative factor

Opalińska¹,

Opalińska²,

Rudnicka³

et al. 2022

pdia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Furthermore, these data about prevalence may underestimated the probability of contact allergy to fragrances, as these results cover only eight of 82 haptens known to cause this allergy (20). Thus, the need for a newly expanded fragrance mix was recognized in the 1990s, when it was found that 15% of fragrance allergies were not identified by fragrance mix I. Fragrance mix II is able to identify additional individuals with undiagnosed fragrance sensitivity to fragrance mix I (26). The series in the present study used also fragrance mix II, with a prevalence of contact allergy of 2.4%.…”

Section: F O R P U B L I C a T I O Nmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…With MI as an isolated preservative in cosmetics, a pandemic of dermatitis to this substance has emerged in recent years (28). For this reason, MI was named "allergen of the year" in 2013 by the American Contact Dermatitis Society (26). It is a potential primary sensitizing substance that has been used at a higher concentration to be effective, which explains the explosion of cases worldwide (29).…”

Section: F O R P U B L I C a T I O Nmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prospective study of consecutive patch testing in patients with contact dermatitis using an adapted Latin American baseline series

Belluco

Giavina‐Bianchi

Belluco

et al. 2023

Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Contact dermatitis is a disease characterized by pruritic skin lesions with high prevalence rates. The patch test is an instrument to evaluate contact allergies. Current data on characteristics of the affected population and studies about patch testing using adequate baseline series are needed. Objectives:To describe the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of a population with suspected contact dermatitis who underwent to a patch testing using an adapted Latin American baseline series in the departments of allergy and dermatology of a referral center in Brasília, Brazil, between March and December 2020.Methods: Observational, descriptive and analytical clinical study with prospective data collection was performed in consecutively evaluated patients at a referral center. The results of 208 participants who underwent patch testing using an adapted Latin American baseline series containing 40 allergens were analyzed, and the prevalence of contact allergies was compared with data from the literature. Pearson's chi-square test was used to calculate the odds ratio and respective 95% confidence interval for qualitative variables. Quantitative variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. The four most prevalent allergens were entered into multiple binary logistic regression models as response variables to identify the main explanatory variables associated with these allergies. The significance of the regression parameters was tested using the Wald statistical test. Results:The mean age of participants was 42.6 years. A total of 69.7% had one or more positive tests. Among those with positive tests, 82.8% were women (OR = 1.371; p = 0.398). The hands were the most commonly affected site at 43%. An occupational history was detected in 19.2%. The most common allergen was nickel sulfate (32.2%), followed by sodium tetrachloropalladate (19.7%), fragrance mix I (15.4%), and methylisothiazolinone (13.5%). In multivariate logistic regression models, nickel was significantly related to female sex (p < 0.05), as well as palladium (p < 0.05). Fragrance mix I was related to a family history of allergy (p < 0.05). On the other hand, methylisothiazolinone was statistically significantly related to face (p < 0.05) and hand (p < 0.001) lesions. Conclusion:This study demonstrated a detailed profile of a population with suspected allergic contact dermatitis. Our patch test results, using an adapted Latin American baseline series, represent a significant update of this important diagnostic tool.

show abstract

American Contact Dermatitis Society Allergens of the Year 2000 to 2020

Cited by 20 publications

References 46 publications

Global Burden, Incidence and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for Dermatitis: A Systematic Analysis Combined With Socioeconomic Development Status, 1990–2019

Global Burden, Incidence and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for Dermatitis: A Systematic Analysis Combined With Socioeconomic Development Status, 1990–2019

Contact eczema induced by hybrid manicure. The role of acrylates as a causative factor

Prospective study of consecutive patch testing in patients with contact dermatitis using an adapted Latin American baseline series

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About