1968
DOI: 10.15288/qjsa.1968.29.130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

American Drinking Practices: Summary of Findings from a National Probability Sample. I. Extent of Drinking by Population Subgroups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
1
1

Year Published

1971
1971
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
36
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 presents the percentage distributions of the collapsed categories for frequency of drinking and the quantity/frequency index. These percentages are comparable to those found in national and regional surveys on drinking in this age group (Borgatta et al 1982; Department of Health and Human Services 1981; Meyers et al 1981Meyers et al /1982Holzer et al 1984; Cahalan and Cisin 1968).…”
Section: Sociodemographic Variablessupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 1 presents the percentage distributions of the collapsed categories for frequency of drinking and the quantity/frequency index. These percentages are comparable to those found in national and regional surveys on drinking in this age group (Borgatta et al 1982; Department of Health and Human Services 1981; Meyers et al 1981Meyers et al /1982Holzer et al 1984; Cahalan and Cisin 1968).…”
Section: Sociodemographic Variablessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Surveys of local, regional, and national samples consistently find drinking behavior to be negatively associated with age; the elderly are less likely than younger persons to be drinkers, heavy drinkers, or problem drinkers (Barnes 1979;Meyers et al 1981Meyers et al /1982Butler et al 1982;Cahalan and Cisin 1968;Department of Health and Human Services 1981;Borgatta et al 1982;Holzer et al 1984;Smart and Liban 1982). However, some studies of institutionalized or under-treatment populations (Rosin and Glatt 1971;Apfeldorf et al 1972;Schuckit and Miller 1976) conclude that elderly alcohol abuse is a large and serious social problem that is under-recognized and under-reported (National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism 1982;Zimberg 1974aZimberg , 1974bPetersen and Whittington 1977;Glantz 1982;Smart and Liban 1982;Maddox et al 1984).…”
Section: Elderly Drinking Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) The prevalence here of alcohol abuse for women is little short of that for men, a finding at variance with most reports for younger age groups, where men predominate (Bailey et al, 1965;Calahan and Cisin, 1968;Edwards et al, 1973;King, 1986), but in keeping with other reports for the elderly (Rosin and Glatt, 1971).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Response rates to questionnaires to alcoholics even from well motivated groups such as members of A.A. tend to be lower (Jellinek 1946, Bohince and Orenstein 1950, Hore 1974, than those reported from questionnaire studies of other groups of patients including patients suffering from other psychiatric disorders, (Cooper 1965, Goldberg andBlackwell 1970). In community surveys, Mulford and Miller (1959) found 20-7 per cent ofthe sample population refused to be interviewed whilst Cahalan and Cisin (1968) found 22 per cent of heavy drinkers refused to be interviewed, and 12-15 per cent not classified as heavy drinkers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%