2016
DOI: 10.1093/publius/pjw011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

American Federalism in an Era of Partisan Polarization: The Intergovernmental Paradox of Obama’s “New Nationalism”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
16
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of this fractured federalism is that states have adopted a patchwork of policy standards and implementation across the country ( Bowling and Pickerill 2013 ), in what Conlan and Posner (2016) refer to as “variable speed federalism.” A notable feature of variable-speed federalism is that there are significant regional variations in politics and policy that align with regional partisan characteristics. Moreover, states push back on implementing federal policies because of political polarization and the associated level of agreement with current presidential administrations ( Haeder and Weimer 2013 ).…”
Section: The State Of American Federalism Pre-covid-19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of this fractured federalism is that states have adopted a patchwork of policy standards and implementation across the country ( Bowling and Pickerill 2013 ), in what Conlan and Posner (2016) refer to as “variable speed federalism.” A notable feature of variable-speed federalism is that there are significant regional variations in politics and policy that align with regional partisan characteristics. Moreover, states push back on implementing federal policies because of political polarization and the associated level of agreement with current presidential administrations ( Haeder and Weimer 2013 ).…”
Section: The State Of American Federalism Pre-covid-19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This manifests not only in the way governors advocate for policies within their own states, but also how they lobby federal officials and wade into conflict over disputed policy areas. Legislative gridlock and the appearance of federal inaction on key policy issues, such as climate change, only serves as a catalyst for more aggressive state action, as state elected officials find political advantage in occupying a contested policy space, advocacy groups venue shop for policymaking bodies friendly to their cause, and voters of the opposing party become dissatisfied with presidential or Congressional actions (Conlan & Posner, 2016; Jensen, 2017; Rose & Bowling, 2015; Rose & Goelzhauser, 2018).…”
Section: Governors As Partisan Actorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of particular interest is the comparison between the Obama administration and the prior time periods. Not only are there extraordinary levels of polarization and partisan rancor during the Obama administration, but health care has become a dominant policy domain as well as concerns over federalism during the Obama administration (Bulman-Pozen and Metzger 2016; Conlan and Posner 2016; Metzger 2011).…”
Section: Data Sources and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%