2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icpr.2010.937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

American Sign Language Phrase Verification in an Educational Game for Deaf Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Zafrulla et al (2010) have performed real-time ASL phrase verification for an educational game, Copycat using HMMs, by applying a rejection threshold on the probability of the observed sequence for each sign in the phrase. They have tested this approach using 1,204 signed phrase samples from 11 deaf children during live game play of CopyCat.…”
Section: Gamesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Zafrulla et al (2010) have performed real-time ASL phrase verification for an educational game, Copycat using HMMs, by applying a rejection threshold on the probability of the observed sequence for each sign in the phrase. They have tested this approach using 1,204 signed phrase samples from 11 deaf children during live game play of CopyCat.…”
Section: Gamesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the MKST was available, body pose tracking with the Kinect camera was possible using the OpenNI framework and the PrimeSense NITE middleware. Zafrulla et al [5] used the PrimeSense tracker to perform sentence recognition on a dataset of ASL sentences from an educational game called CopyCat [26]. Copper et al [27] used the PrimeSense tracker to perform linguistic sub-unit-based sign language recognition on signs from German Sign Language.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Translation is an interesting problem because it also involves video rather than audio processing. [5] classify signs to verify the correctness of a child's response to a sign language tutoring program. Signs are classified using a forward and backward pass model, essentially considering possible phrases both forward and backward, using a confidence model and accelerometer data from gloves worn on the signers' hands.…”
Section: Relevance To Others' Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signs are classified using a forward and backward pass model, essentially considering possible phrases both forward and backward, using a confidence model and accelerometer data from gloves worn on the signers' hands. This work is particularly relevant since it also involves children but the intent in [5] is to teach sign language while our demonstration fosters discussion about technology to teach in sign language.…”
Section: Relevance To Others' Workmentioning
confidence: 99%