2011
DOI: 10.1093/publius/pjr018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

American State Cultures: Testing a New Measure and Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, this paper provides support for the race/ethnicity theory. In an important study, Hero and Preuhs (2007) (Lieske, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, this paper provides support for the race/ethnicity theory. In an important study, Hero and Preuhs (2007) (Lieske, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 The states also vary, at least somewhat, in political culture. According to Lieske (2012), Alaska has an individualistic/traditional political culture, Colorado an individualist and Minnesota a moralistic/individualistic culture. However, one should not error is over generalizing the findings of the research presented here to all other states.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, greater numbers of women candidates emerge in areas that, when compared to national averages, are more progressive and welcoming to political change and have smaller populations of religious Americans (Setzler, ). A state's political culture (Elazar, ; for an alternative approach to culture, see Lieske, , ) may also advance or deter the emergence of women candidates. Women in moralistic states (located largely in New England and along the U.S.‐Canada border) are the most likely to run for office, while women in traditionalistic states (particularly the South) are the least likely to run for office (Hogan, ).…”
Section: Context Gender and Running For Officementioning
confidence: 99%