1986
DOI: 10.2307/3639703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

American Wildlife Policy and Environmental Ideology: Poisoning Coyotes, 1939-1972

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the while, Canada often boasted of the abundance of its large game, and emphasized that abundance by donating animals to foreign collections (Dunlap 1991;Jones 2002;Colpitts 2002;. Thomas Dunlap's (1984, 1986 work on predator control already proves the value of comparative work on that topic, but Theodore Catton's (1997) and John Sandlos's (2007) separate examinations of the roles of aboriginal people in national parks in Alaska and the Northwest Territories offer only unrealized evidence that a comparative study would repay the effort. Other studies relating to aboriginal people and national parks offer similar tantalizing evidence.…”
Section: Comparative Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the while, Canada often boasted of the abundance of its large game, and emphasized that abundance by donating animals to foreign collections (Dunlap 1991;Jones 2002;Colpitts 2002;. Thomas Dunlap's (1984, 1986 work on predator control already proves the value of comparative work on that topic, but Theodore Catton's (1997) and John Sandlos's (2007) separate examinations of the roles of aboriginal people in national parks in Alaska and the Northwest Territories offer only unrealized evidence that a comparative study would repay the effort. Other studies relating to aboriginal people and national parks offer similar tantalizing evidence.…”
Section: Comparative Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%