1997
DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.1997.7106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amiloride-Sensitive Na+Channels in Human Nasal Epithelium Are Different from Classical Epithelial Na+Channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
5

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
14
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, to our very surprise we could not spot any of these Cl -conductances by applying the respective blockers the channels are sensitive for. Neither DPC nor DIDS nor NPPB showed any remarkable reduction on I SC in the presence of amiloride, which was applied to circumvent unwanted effects of the Cl -channel blockers on Na + conductances as reported earlier [7]. By comparing the results from non-CF nasal tissue with those obtained from CF nasal cells, we found that there is no difference in Cl -secretion behavior between these 2 groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Yet, to our very surprise we could not spot any of these Cl -conductances by applying the respective blockers the channels are sensitive for. Neither DPC nor DIDS nor NPPB showed any remarkable reduction on I SC in the presence of amiloride, which was applied to circumvent unwanted effects of the Cl -channel blockers on Na + conductances as reported earlier [7]. By comparing the results from non-CF nasal tissue with those obtained from CF nasal cells, we found that there is no difference in Cl -secretion behavior between these 2 groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…the outwardly rectifying Clchannel (ORCC), had no distinct effect on I SC , demonstrating the lack of DIDS-or DPC-sensitive Cl -conductances in this tissue. Since it has been shown recently that DPC also blocks amiloride-sensitive Na + channel in human nasal epithelium [7], Cl -channel blockers always were applied in the presence of amiloride (100 ÌM). However, we were rather surprised that there also was nearly no remarkable activation of any Cl -conductances in non-CF tissue as demonstrated by the essen-Rückes-Nilges/Weber/Lindemann/ Münker/Clauss/Weber Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As expected, the control cells had the highest amiloride-sensitive current. It is well known that primary HNE cells have an amiloride-sensitive current [38,39]. In comparison, in cells transfected with different doses of wtCFTR-mRNA the transepithelial ENaC current decreased stepwise, possibly showing a trend in the down-regulation of ENaC by CFTR (Fig.…”
Section: Does the Boosted Cftr Expression Affect Enac?mentioning
confidence: 84%