1973
DOI: 10.1093/jn/103.9.1306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amino Acid Requirement of the Growing Rabbit: An Estimate of Quantitative Needs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0
3

Year Published

1977
1977
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For SAA, the concentration in proteins was lower than the generally accepted recommended value of 3.75% (De Blas and Mateos, 1998;Lebas 2004), but was homogenous for the three experimental diets. Nevertheless, this level still falls within the safety zone, where various authors have previously situated the optimum level for SAA ever since the very first proposition established by Adamson and Fisher (1973). A more valid point for the present comparison is the fact that the SAA level was homogenous for the three experimental diets.…”
Section: Nutritional Composition Of Dietsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…For SAA, the concentration in proteins was lower than the generally accepted recommended value of 3.75% (De Blas and Mateos, 1998;Lebas 2004), but was homogenous for the three experimental diets. Nevertheless, this level still falls within the safety zone, where various authors have previously situated the optimum level for SAA ever since the very first proposition established by Adamson and Fisher (1973). A more valid point for the present comparison is the fact that the SAA level was homogenous for the three experimental diets.…”
Section: Nutritional Composition Of Dietsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Studies to determine the required levels of amino acids for rabbits began in the 1960s (McWard et al, 1967;Gaman & Fisher, 1970;Cheeke, 1971;Adamson & Fisher, 1971, with those focusing on commercial animals starting in the 1970s (Lebas et al, 1973;Colin, 1975;Davison & Spreadbury 1975;Spreadbury, 1978) and forming the basis of the nutritional recommendations included in the NRC (NRC, 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of caecotrophy and caecal metabolism on nitrogen digestion and body retention (Tacker and Brant, 1955, Yoshida and Kandatsu, 1960and 1964Yoshida et al, 1968Yoshida et al, , 1971Yoshida et al, and 1972Hoover and Heitman, 1975;Proto, 1976), or the essentiality of some amino acids for growth (McWard et al, 1967;Gaman and Fisher, 1970;Cheeke, 1971;Fisher, 1971 and have been determined by several authors. From these studies, it was concluded that caecal microbiota are able to use non-protein compounds (such as urea) and that caecotrophy helps to improve N digestion and retention.…”
Section: Introduction: a Historical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%