2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amino substituted benzimidazo[1,2- a ]quinolines: Antiproliferative potency, 3D QSAR study and DNA binding properties

Abstract: We describe the synthesis, 3D-derived quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR), antiproliferative activity and DNA binding properties of a series of 2-amino, 5-amino and 2,5-diamino substituted benzimidazo[1,2-a]quinolines prepared by environmentally friendly uncatalyzed microwave assisted amination. The antiproliferative activities were assessed in vitro against colon, lung and breast carcinoma cell lines; activities ranged from submicromolar to micromolar. The strongest antiproliferative activity … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the strong stacking interaction between the base pairs of DNA and aromatic chromophores. The DNA binding constants of 4 a‐g and 5 a‐f (Table ) concluded that these compounds interacted with CT‐DNA through intercalation mode which is well supported by the available literature for similar kind of compounds . It is also indicated that the compounds form adducts with DNA through intercalation and were stabilized by hydrophobic and hydrogen bonds interactions ,.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Due to the strong stacking interaction between the base pairs of DNA and aromatic chromophores. The DNA binding constants of 4 a‐g and 5 a‐f (Table ) concluded that these compounds interacted with CT‐DNA through intercalation mode which is well supported by the available literature for similar kind of compounds . It is also indicated that the compounds form adducts with DNA through intercalation and were stabilized by hydrophobic and hydrogen bonds interactions ,.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Attributable to the strong stacking interaction between the aromatic chromophores and the base pairs of DNA. The DNA binding constants of 3 f , 4 a , 5 a, 6 a, 7 a , and 8 a (Table ) inferred that these compounds interacted with CT‐DNA through intercalation mode which is well supported by the available literature for similar kind of compounds . It is also suggested that the compounds form adducts with DNA via intercalation and were stabilized by hydrophobic and hydrogen bonds interactions .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Compound 625 showed most potent cytotoxic activity with IC 50 > 50 μM, 39.55 ± 2.28 μM, >50 μM, >50 μM, >50 μM, >50 μM, 41.23 ± 3.82 μM and >50 μM against cancer cell lines using sunitinib as a reference standard. Perin et al reported the anti‐proliferative and DNA binding properties of a series of 2‐amino, 5‐amino and 2,5‐diamino‐substituted benzimidazo[1,2‐a]quinolones and assessed for anti‐proliferative activity against colon, lung and breast carcinoma cell lines (Scheme ). Compounds 630a , b were found to be most potent with IC 50 = 0.6 ± 0.3 μM, 2 ±1 μM, 1 ± 0.8 μM and 0.3 ± 0.08 μM, 0.6 ± 0.2 μM and 0.5 ± 0.04 μM using doxorubicin and etoposide as the standard drugs.…”
Section: Pharmacological and Synthetic Profiles Of Benzimidazole Derimentioning
confidence: 99%