“…Only the influence of 29-deoxy groups was further characterized kinetically with chemically synthesized halves, ligated enzymatically to full tRNAs containing single 29-deoxy groups at the positions suggested by the interference assay (Table 1)+ Inhibition was observed for all but the dU29-containing tRNA, which showed a slight increase of k cat /K m relative to the allribo ligated tRNA+ This remains unexplained+ The extent of inhibition was most obvious at A76, the 39 terminal nucleotide where the amino acid will be attached+ Considering that the synthetase is a class II type, attaching the amino acid to the 39 hydroxyl, this finding confers significance to the presence of the 29 hydroxy group (Arnez & Moras, 1997)+ A 5-6-fold decrease is seen, except for U25, for positions C74, C36, and G34 in the acceptor stem and in the anticodon loop, both regions interacting with the synthetase (in the yeast system, Ruff et al+ (1991); in the E. coli system, D+ Moras, pers+ comm+)+ An approximate threefold reduction in charging was seen for C67, A58, and A24+ For the other positions the effect was smaller+ In conclusion, it is observed that single 29-deoxy substitutions had, in general, only a minor effect on charging and the effect is well below the losses in aminoacylation efficiency found for base changes of the discriminator nucleotides (Giegé et al+, 1993)+ This observation agrees with earlier results with E. coli tRNA Ala and E. coli tRNA Pro , which, however, had been analyzed using minihelices or tRNAs assembled from fragments (Musier-Forsyth & Schimmel, 1992;Liu & Musier-Forsyth, 1994;Yap & MusierForsyth, 1995)+ In contrast, multiple occurrences of 29-deoxy modifications in at least one half of E. coli tRNA Asp resulted in a dramatic decrease of charging, with the exception of the dA series+ The half harboring the more important interference positions showed the stronger inhibition+ This cumulative effect of 29-deoxy groups has been observed for other tRNAs or tRNA fragments (Khan & Roe, 1988;Perreault et al+, 1989;Musier-Forsyth & Schimmel, 1992;Yap & Musier-Forsyth, 1995; Aphasizhev et al+, 1997)+ An explanation for these observations might be that the presence of several 29-deoxy functions causes a conformational effect incompatible with productive interaction with the enzyme+ A difference in conformation for the yeast tRNA Asp containing any one of the four nucleotides entirely as the 29-deoxy derivative has indeed been verified experimentally (Aphasizhev et al+, 1997)+ The loss of charging activity found by these authors after complete replacement of uridines or guanosines by their 29-deoxy analogues was attributed to a specific effect of U11 and G27 on the basis of the X-ray structure of the complex (Cavarelli et al+, 1993)+ This is an unusually strong effect caused by one position+ It was not found in the present analysis for position 27 and only to a smaller extent at position 11+ A functional difference from the otherwise related yeast system is one explanation+ However, the involvement of several more deoxy positions contributing ...…”