2022
DOI: 10.7554/elife.79148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aminomethanesulfonic acid illuminates the boundary between full and partial agonists of the pentameric glycine receptor

Abstract: To clarify the determinants of agonist efficacy in pentameric ligand-gated ion channels we examined a new compound, aminomethanesulfonic acid (AMS), a molecule intermediate in structure between glycine and taurine. Despite wide availability, to date there are no reports of AMS action on glycine receptors, perhaps because AMS is unstable at physiological pH. Here we show that at pH 5, AMS is an efficacious agonist, eliciting in zebrafish α1 glycine receptors a maximum single channel open probability of 0.85, mu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, the relative stability of the open state in TMEM16A is dictated by the degree of binding site closure, with incomplete closure resulting in channels that open with lower probability (Figs 1 , 2 , 4 and EV5 ). It seems, therefore, that unlike the robustness of the ECD‐TMD interface in pLGICs when bound to ligands with different efficacy (Yu et al , 2021 ; Ivica et al , 2022 ), the profound local structural changes between the closely apposed ligand binding and pore modules in TMEM16A may naturally give rise to a more obligatory coupling between binding site closure and channel opening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, the relative stability of the open state in TMEM16A is dictated by the degree of binding site closure, with incomplete closure resulting in channels that open with lower probability (Figs 1 , 2 , 4 and EV5 ). It seems, therefore, that unlike the robustness of the ECD‐TMD interface in pLGICs when bound to ligands with different efficacy (Yu et al , 2021 ; Ivica et al , 2022 ), the profound local structural changes between the closely apposed ligand binding and pore modules in TMEM16A may naturally give rise to a more obligatory coupling between binding site closure and channel opening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%