2020
DOI: 10.1016/s2152-2650(20)30759-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AML-335: Treating Hematologic Oncology Patients in the Developing World During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Case series and surveys conducted in Mexico and Armenia, respectively, noted that the main challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic were staff shortages (reduced to 50% in a single center in Mexico City) due to positive cases and direct contact with infected staff ( 62 , 63 ). At one hematology center in Armenia, researchers noted supply chain disruptions and delays (e.g., chemotherapy infusions postponed) as well as increases in the price of certain drugs and supplies (e.g., the price of PPE increased by more than 10 times) ( 62 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Case series and surveys conducted in Mexico and Armenia, respectively, noted that the main challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic were staff shortages (reduced to 50% in a single center in Mexico City) due to positive cases and direct contact with infected staff ( 62 , 63 ). At one hematology center in Armenia, researchers noted supply chain disruptions and delays (e.g., chemotherapy infusions postponed) as well as increases in the price of certain drugs and supplies (e.g., the price of PPE increased by more than 10 times) ( 62 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Healthcare delays and disruptions have been particularly increased for pediatric oncology patients in LMICs. Staff shortages were described primarily in LMICs, with supply chain disruptions, and increase in prices of chemotherapeutic drugs and PPE ( 62 ). These results are well captured by Graetz et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%