2013
DOI: 10.1108/13685201311318494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AML‐CTF: a forced marriage post 9/11 and its effect on financial institutions

Abstract: Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to explain the incompatibility of anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing (CTF) measures as a hasty over-reaction after 9/11, focusing on the compliance burdens that this imposes on the regulated sector, most notably financial institutions. Design/methodology/approach -This paper explains the fundamental differences between money laundering and terrorist financing. It follows the evolution of the marriage between AML and CTF measures in the USA and the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, he also contended that what the funds were to be used for would define its scope. Similar to Mugira (2010) and Sinha (2013) suggest that financing of terrorism can involve legal and illegal activities. Financing of terrorism is not a sub-set of money laundering.…”
Section: Terrorism Financing Vs Money Launderingsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…However, he also contended that what the funds were to be used for would define its scope. Similar to Mugira (2010) and Sinha (2013) suggest that financing of terrorism can involve legal and illegal activities. Financing of terrorism is not a sub-set of money laundering.…”
Section: Terrorism Financing Vs Money Launderingsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, changed the mood of the public in general. The financial community, in particular, was distinctly negative as they realized that banks were complicit in money laundering and the financing of terrorist activities (Sinha, 2013). Regulators were also more serious about resolving money laundering issues through financial institutions, and by adding strong controls in the legislation and willingness to impose heavier fines as a result of non-compliance, banks were compelled to invest significantly in their AML processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the association between money laundering and financing of terrorism is arguable, the debate is outside the focus of this article. However, the prevailing viewpoint regards terrorist financing as part of money laundering (McCulloch and Pickering, 2005; Sinha, 2013). The major industrialized nations, particularly the USA and intergovernmental organizations, especially the Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (FATF), have been the main driving forces behind the enactment of national AML/CTF laws worldwide (Amoore and De Goede, 2005; Hülsse, and Kerwer, 2007; Whitaker, 2007; Gelemerova, 2009) [11].…”
Section: Money Laundering and Lawyers Notaries And Independent Legal Professionals And The Gatekeeping Obligationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11. For further discussions on the link between money laundering and financing of terrorism, see Hardouin and Weichhardt (2006); Hutchinson and O’Malley (2007) and Sinha (2013).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%