2020
DOI: 10.3390/atmos11101108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ammonia Emissions from Differing Manure Storage Facilities at Two Midwestern Free-Stall Dairies

Abstract: Dairies contribute a major portion of agricultural ammonia emissions in the United States. Emissions were monitored over two years from an anaerobic lagoon receiving manure from cows in the milking parlor and holding area in Indiana (IN), USA and a storage basin receiving manure from cows in barns as well as the milking parlor and holding area in Wisconsin (WI), USA. Emissions were monitored using open-path tunable diode lasers, sonic anemometers, and two emission models. The mean annual daily emissions at the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were consistent with the reactor study where dilution of the manure reduced H 2 S emissions, but the high variability in emissions prevented statistical support for this reduction (Ni et al, 2010). Annual H 2 S emissions were 212 g m −2 (807 g head −1 , 1,026 g AU −1 ); however, because the lagoon contains only waste from the milking area, this does not represent the entire farm's emissions (Grant & Boehm, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results were consistent with the reactor study where dilution of the manure reduced H 2 S emissions, but the high variability in emissions prevented statistical support for this reduction (Ni et al, 2010). Annual H 2 S emissions were 212 g m −2 (807 g head −1 , 1,026 g AU −1 ); however, because the lagoon contains only waste from the milking area, this does not represent the entire farm's emissions (Grant & Boehm, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emission periods were excluded if (a) friction velocity (U * ) was <0.15 m s −1 , (b) the absolute value of the Monin-Obukhov length was <2 m, (c) the calculated background H 2 S concentration was less than twice the instrument sensitivity (1.7 μl L −1 ), (d) the wind direction SD was >30 o , (e) the touchdown fraction was <0.15 (Flesch & Wilson, 2005), or (f) the attack angle rela-tive to the line sample was <60 • . Because the lagoon source received only waste from the milking parlor and holding area (Grant & Boehm, 2020), calculated emissions do not represent the entire farm's emissions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The season did not influence the N intake, but the irreversible N losses to the atmosphere tended to be higher during the warm season (Table 1). This could be explained by the fact that higher temperatures would increase NH 3 emission rates, as urease activity increases exponentially above 10 • C [29], given that the main way of N volatilization from manure is through this gas [30][31][32].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because emissions were measured for only a portion of the manure storage area, it was necessary to estimate the population of cows loading the measured area based on the average number of cows present in the facilities that were loading this area, assuming manure deposition was uniform throughout the day and across the barns, holding area and milking parlor. The average population loading the basins was estimated as 559 lactating cows, or 710 animal units (1 AU = 500 kg) based on the mean mass of the cows (Grant & Boehm, 2020; Grant et al., 2015). This was determined based on the time the lactating cows (1,506 hd) spent being milked (three times a day for 30 min each milking) and the time that cows (496 hd) were present in the two barns contributing to the measured area.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%