Acidification in Finland 1990
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-75450-0_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ammonia Emissions in the 1980s

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a given fiber type, differences in web strength originate from structural features, which may cause the difference in the interfiber bonding patterns and load carrying points of foam- and wet-laid webs. The typical evaluation of web strength with tensile strength is based on the assumption that fibers alone are responsible for the stretching failure . Therefore, the tensile index generally depends on the apparent density, which is shown in Figure a.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For a given fiber type, differences in web strength originate from structural features, which may cause the difference in the interfiber bonding patterns and load carrying points of foam- and wet-laid webs. The typical evaluation of web strength with tensile strength is based on the assumption that fibers alone are responsible for the stretching failure . Therefore, the tensile index generally depends on the apparent density, which is shown in Figure a.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirically, the elongation at break of the fiber network relates to a universal failure threshold of fibers and/or bonds . For a given grammage, fiber type, and specimen dimensions, the presence of more out-of-plane fiber segments is expected to produce a weaker resistance to plastic deformation under tension, and, thus, display lower elongation at break (Figure b, right and blank panel).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, Skowronski and Szwarcsztajn 36 concluded that paper would only react elastically below the Kubat stress. Similarly, Waterhouse 37 and Niskanen 38 stated that the Kubat stress must be overcome for any significant stress relaxation to occur. Niskanen 35 further discussed that stress relaxation may occur below the Kubat stress, but it is too slow to measure.…”
Section: Rheological Model Derivationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Given that stress relaxation and creep are effectively the inverse of one another, it is proposed that if such an activation stress exists for stress relaxation behavior, that it would also exist for creep behavior. Like Niskanen,38 it is not argued that time-dependent deformation ceases to occur below such an activation stress, but a change in deformation behavior occurs near this stress and all deformation below it can be ignored. As a result, an activation stress, r k , is incorporated in to eq.…”
Section: Rheological Model Derivationmentioning
confidence: 99%