1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00880.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ammonia emissions to the atmosphere from leaves of wild plants and Hordeum vulgare treated with methionine sulphoximine

Abstract: Using field plots, three species (Mercurialis perennis L., Rubus fruticosus L., and Trientalis europaea L.) were tested for their potential to emit gaseous ammonia to the atmosphere. Canopies were misted with 5 m methionine sulphoximine (MSO) to inhibit glutamine synthetase (GS), the enzyme of ammonium assimilation. Leaf tissue NH % + concentration of control plants was 0n03-0n1 µmol g −" f. wt. Although NH % + accumulated in the leaf tissue of MSO-treated plants of all three species to similar concent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides being released from the soil, NH 3 can be emitted from senescing plant parts (Hanstein & Felle 1999). In addition, plants give off N-NH 3 , through the stomata, as has been observed in rice (Oryza sativa L.) (Silva & Stutte 1981), wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) (Parton et al 1988), and pea (Pisum sativum L.) (Betelsen & Jensen 1992), as well as in several wild species, such as Mercurialis perennis L., Rubus fruticosus L., and Trientalis europaea L. (Pearson et al 1998). There is strong evidence that increased N level in the atmosphere is beneficial to epiphytic plants up to a certain limit (Baxter et al 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides being released from the soil, NH 3 can be emitted from senescing plant parts (Hanstein & Felle 1999). In addition, plants give off N-NH 3 , through the stomata, as has been observed in rice (Oryza sativa L.) (Silva & Stutte 1981), wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) (Parton et al 1988), and pea (Pisum sativum L.) (Betelsen & Jensen 1992), as well as in several wild species, such as Mercurialis perennis L., Rubus fruticosus L., and Trientalis europaea L. (Pearson et al 1998). There is strong evidence that increased N level in the atmosphere is beneficial to epiphytic plants up to a certain limit (Baxter et al 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van der Eerden et al (1992) and PerezSoba et al (1995) observed a decrease in root biomass and in mycorrhizal infection of Pinus sylvestris and Pseudotsuga menziesii after NH $ exposure over several weeks. Recently Pearson et al (1998) measured a decrease in root amino acids in H. vulgare exposed to a short NH $ pulse of high concentration. The current investigation indicates that B. erectus seems to have a lower threshold for adverse NH $ effects on root physiology than B. pinnatum and A. elatius.…”
Section: Competitive Ability Of the Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, NH % + assimilation within the leaf cells releases protons (Raven, 1988), and it has been hypothesized that growth at elevated NH $ concentrations may in the long term lead to increased shoot acid load (Raven, 1988 ;Pearson & Stewart, 1993), which could also affect the apoplastic pH. Pearson et al (1998) recently suggested that apoplastic pH is an important factor that explains differences between species in their emission of NH $ to the atmosphere. Compensation points for NH $ in plant species from natural and semi-natural ecosystems have so far only been measured in a few cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During photorespiration, proteins in mitochondria are deaminated and the photorespiratory NH 4 + is transferred to chloroplasts where it is re-assimilated by glutamine synthetase (GS) [42]. In higher plants, the reassimilatory flux of NH 4 + during photorespiration may be 10-fold greater than primary N assimilation [43], [44]. This N release by agricultural crops was estimated in the range of 0–4.1 kg N ha −1 y −1 [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%