2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2012.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ammonia losses from the storage and application of raw and chemo-mechanically separated slurry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Italy pig farms produce approximately 17 million tons per year of slurry (Dinuccio et al, 2012). At the same time, specialization of livestock production has led to a concentration of animal production on large farms in restricted areas, a pattern found throughout Europe (Møller et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Italy pig farms produce approximately 17 million tons per year of slurry (Dinuccio et al, 2012). At the same time, specialization of livestock production has led to a concentration of animal production on large farms in restricted areas, a pattern found throughout Europe (Møller et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Amon et al (2006) demonstrated that, although mechanical separation can result in lower N losses during spreading, this reduction did not compensate the increase in emissions during the storage phase. Dinuccio et al (2012) found that compared to raw pig slurry, storage and broadcast application to land of separated fractions increased NH 3 emissions by up to 17% and the liquid fraction was the main source of NH 3 losses.…”
Section: Considerations Across the Manure Management Continuummentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Slurry use as fertilizer should be based on its nutrient and C content (considering potential nitrogen [N] and C losses during on-farm storage) to reduce negative environmental impacts . Losses of N and C as ammonia (NH 3 ), nitrous oxide (N 2 O), and methane (CH 4 ) during slurry storage are particularly relevant (Chadwick et al, 2011;Dinuccio et al, 2012) and should be evaluated and minimized via cost-effective mitigation methods.…”
Section: Nutrient Losses During Winter and Summer Storage Of Separatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slurry use as fertilizer should be based on its nutrient and C content (considering potential nitrogen [N] and C losses during on-farm storage) to reduce negative environmental impacts . Losses of N and C as ammonia (NH 3 ), nitrous oxide (N 2 O), and methane (CH 4 ) during slurry storage are particularly relevant (Chadwick et al, 2011;Dinuccio et al, 2012) and should be evaluated and minimized via cost-effective mitigation methods.Using the integrated modeling tool MITERRA-EUROPE, Oenema et al (2007) estimated that in the EU almost 30% of the N excreted in dairy barns is lost during storage. Approximately 63% of the loss was via NH 3 emissions; 23% was lost following nitrification or denitrification as nitric oxide (NO), N 2 O, and N 2 ; and 13% was lost due to leaching and run-off.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%