1993
DOI: 10.1104/pp.103.4.1249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ammonium Uptake by Rice Roots (I. Fluxes and Subcellular Distribution of 13NH4+)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

16
156
3
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
16
156
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be explained by each plant's specific and varietal characteristics, and by experimental conditions. Thus, there is a wide range of plant responses to NH 4 + nutrition; there are some species that are tolerant to high NH 4 + doses, such as rice (Wang et al, 1993), and some very sensitive species which practically cannot survive under NH 4 + nutrition, such as tomato or barley (Britto et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be explained by each plant's specific and varietal characteristics, and by experimental conditions. Thus, there is a wide range of plant responses to NH 4 + nutrition; there are some species that are tolerant to high NH 4 + doses, such as rice (Wang et al, 1993), and some very sensitive species which practically cannot survive under NH 4 + nutrition, such as tomato or barley (Britto et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4b). Carrier-mediated NH % + transport has been reported for green algae (Walker et al, 1979), liverworts (Felle, 1980), and higher plants (Ullrich et al, 1984 ;Wang et al, 1993Wang et al, , 1994, and an overview is given by Kleiner (1981). Green leaves of higher plants have hitherto not been well characterized, but because of the increasing pollution of the atmosphere with NH $ , such studies have become increasingly important (Nielsen & Schjoerring, 1998).…”
Section: Transport Of Nhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus we suggest that the cytoplasmic [NH % + ] in these leaves remains in the lower millimolar range. On the other hand, Wang et al (1993), applying compartmental analysis, came to estimates of 38 mM for rice roots grown in 1 mM NH % + ; the apparent higher affinity of the root transporter could be the reason for such high accumulations. It remains unclear whether NH % + transport in roots and leaves can be compared, and indeed there is evidence that transcripts of an NH % + transporter from tomato accumulated in roots, but not in shoots or leaves (Lauter et al, 1996).…”
Section: Transport Of Nhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, N-use efficiency in rice is of key concern. In sharp contrast to most agricultural soils, where nitrate (NO $ − ) is the predominant N species (Kronzucker et al, 1998), hypoxic conditions in the paddy environment largely preclude the microbial formation of NO $ − through nitrification (Bouldin, 1986 ;Arth et al, 1998) and, consequently, ammonium (NH % + ) is the main form of N available to rice in the field (Shen, 1969 ;Wang et al, 1993 ;Arth et al, 1998 ;Kronzucker et al, 1998). It is therefore not surprising that NH % + nutrition, as opposed to NO $ − nutrition, has received almost exclusive attention in rice (Bonner, 1946 ;Fried et al, 1965 ;Shen, 1969 ;Wang et al, 1993).…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sharp contrast to most agricultural soils, where nitrate (NO $ − ) is the predominant N species (Kronzucker et al, 1998), hypoxic conditions in the paddy environment largely preclude the microbial formation of NO $ − through nitrification (Bouldin, 1986 ;Arth et al, 1998) and, consequently, ammonium (NH % + ) is the main form of N available to rice in the field (Shen, 1969 ;Wang et al, 1993 ;Arth et al, 1998 ;Kronzucker et al, 1998). It is therefore not surprising that NH % + nutrition, as opposed to NO $ − nutrition, has received almost exclusive attention in rice (Bonner, 1946 ;Fried et al, 1965 ;Shen, 1969 ;Wang et al, 1993). However, some reports have indicated that rice does possess some capacity for root NO $ − absorption (Ismunadji & Dijkshoorn, 1971 ;Sasakawa & Yamamoto, 1978 ;Youngdahl et al, 1982 ;Raman et al, 1995) and for the reduction of NO $ − in leaves (Tang & Wu, 1957).…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%