1998
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.65.1.126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amnesia after a discrete basal forebrain lesion

Abstract: Destructive lesions of the basal forebrain are often associated with memory impairment and this structure is thought to contribute to memory function by providing a cholinergic input to critical structures associated with memory such as the hippocampus and amygdala. In previously reported cases of amnesia associated with damage in the basal forebrain, multiple neuroanatomical regions were damaged, and the critical lesion responsible for amnesia has not been identified clearly. We report a patient who developed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
37
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
7
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is similar to previous cases (e.g., Dusoir et al 1990, Abe et al 1998, Tucker et al 1988, in which global amnesia resulted from disconnection of the hippocampus from the MB and basal forebrain. The presence of significant temporal disorientation, which has been associated with the anterior nuclei (Clarke et al 1994), and other thalamic and fornix lesions (Shuren et al 1997, Yasuno et al 1999) further supports our contention of a functional disconnection of the hippocampus and thalamus.…”
Section: Role Of Mammillary Bodies In Memory 93supporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding is similar to previous cases (e.g., Dusoir et al 1990, Abe et al 1998, Tucker et al 1988, in which global amnesia resulted from disconnection of the hippocampus from the MB and basal forebrain. The presence of significant temporal disorientation, which has been associated with the anterior nuclei (Clarke et al 1994), and other thalamic and fornix lesions (Shuren et al 1997, Yasuno et al 1999) further supports our contention of a functional disconnection of the hippocampus and thalamus.…”
Section: Role Of Mammillary Bodies In Memory 93supporting
confidence: 81%
“…Following resection, the patient improved on immediate memory, but remained amnestic after delays. Executive functions and other skills were largely unimpaired and there was no retrograde amnesia.Anterograde amnesia is typically associated with mesial temporal lobe damage, such as in the patient HM (Scoville & Milner 1957), but has been described in association with other forms of pathology, such as lesions to the thalamus (Malamut et al 1992), transection of the fornix and mammillothalamic tracts (Dusoir et al 1990), and basal forebrain lesions (Abe et al 1998). The capability of discrete MB lesions to produce amnesia is unclear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of basal forebrain lesion, mainly seen after removal of tumors and hemorrhage from anterior communicating aneurysms, tends to produce memory deficits which are less severe than those observed in patients with medial diencephalic or mesial temporal lobe damage, and characteristically do not affect non -declarative memory 10,16 . It has been postulated that the amnesia following basal forebrain damage can be a consequence of the interruption of the cholinergic innervation that the nuclei located in this anatomical region provide to the hippocampus and neocortical areas 1,3,10,16 . Nevertheless, the presence of clinically evident memory dysfunctions seems to depend on a combination of basal forebrain nuclei and fiber tracts lesions rather than on damage to a single structure 16 .…”
Section: ; 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been long known that basal forebrain lesions in humans, including those from trauma, tumor, or rupture of the anterior cerebral or anterior communicating arteries result in impaired memory functions (Damasio et al, 1985;Morris et al, 1992;Diamond et al, 1997;Abe et al, 1998). Since multiple anatomic regions were often damaged in these cases, it has been difficult to determine the exact area of the lesion that caused the cognitive symptoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%