“…Generally, various modification strategies such as the controlled fabrication of different crystal phases and planes, , bulk doping, and surface decoration, could be adopted to further optimize its catalytic performance. , Recent reports suggested that crystal phases of MnO x displayed a distinct difference in catalytic oxidation of Cl-VOCs owing to different surface oxygen vacancies, but the exposed planes were not further discussed . The doping of Fe and Ce improved the reducibility of MnO x and the mobility of oxygen, which evidently promoted the oxidation of Cl-VOCs, but the stability and selectivity need to be further improved. , The introduction of Ti, Sn, and Zr led to the formation of more Lewis and Brønsted acid sites besides the enhancement of the redox ability, which presented a superior catalytic activity, durability, and selectivity of polychlorinated byproducts owing to the synergetic effect between acid and redox sites. ,, However, some issues about catalytic oxidation of Cl-VOCs over Mn-based catalysts such as durability and selectivity of polychlorinated byproducts still need to be further discussed. Additionally, it was also known that traditional VOCs such as benzene, toluene, and o-xylene (named as BTX) usually coappeared in the actual industrial emissions with various Cl-VOCs; thus, the versatile Mn-based catalysts were particularly desired.…”