2020
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201914587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amorphous Metal–Organic Framework‐Dominated Nanocomposites with Both Compositional and Structural Heterogeneity for Oxygen Evolution

Abstract: Amorphous metal–organic frameworks (aMOFs) are an emerging family of attractive materials with great application potential, however aMOFs are usually prepared under harsh conditions and aMOFs with complex compositions and structures are rarely reported. In this work, an aMOF‐dominated nanocomposite (aMOF‐NC) with both structural and compositional complexity has been synthesized using a facile approach. A ligand‐competition amorphization mechanism is proposed based on experimental and density functional theory … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
113
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
5
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To characterize the structural difference,t he X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of cMIL-88B, aMIL-88B,a nd aMOF-NC were recorded. As shown in Figure 3a,t he diffraction peaks of cMIL-88B are in perfect match with the simulated patterns, [32] indicating high crystallinity.A fter treatment by 2-MeIM, the crystalline peaks disappeared, suggesting amorphization of MIL-88B.A fter introducing Co 2+ and the growth of nanosheets on aMIL-88B,s till no crystalline peaks can be found in aMOF-NC,c onsistent with the SAED observation. TheF ourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of three samples are presented in the Supporting Information, Figure S6, showing the presence of aminoterephthalate (donated as ATA) retained in aMIL-88B and aMOF-NC.N op eaks associated with 2-MeIM were found.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…To characterize the structural difference,t he X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of cMIL-88B, aMIL-88B,a nd aMOF-NC were recorded. As shown in Figure 3a,t he diffraction peaks of cMIL-88B are in perfect match with the simulated patterns, [32] indicating high crystallinity.A fter treatment by 2-MeIM, the crystalline peaks disappeared, suggesting amorphization of MIL-88B.A fter introducing Co 2+ and the growth of nanosheets on aMIL-88B,s till no crystalline peaks can be found in aMOF-NC,c onsistent with the SAED observation. TheF ourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of three samples are presented in the Supporting Information, Figure S6, showing the presence of aminoterephthalate (donated as ATA) retained in aMIL-88B and aMOF-NC.N op eaks associated with 2-MeIM were found.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…As an important family of porous crystalline materials, the composition and architecture of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are both key factors for their properties and applications 13 19 . To improve the complexity of MOF-based composites with broadened functions, the assembly of MOFs and other nanomaterials is a promising approach 20 23 . Meanwhile, conjugation of two or more different MOFs into one MOF-on-MOF hybrid material presents another strategy for the fabrication of complicated MOF hybrids with unprecedented nanostructures 24 35 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface area (S BET ) of ZIF-8 reaches 1440 m 2 /g, in agreement with the previous reports well. [20,26] Sn 2 + competitive coordination may generate substantive amorphous phase defects in xSZ catalysts, [27] resulting in the higher S BET values of 1638-2193 m 2 / g (Table S2). The catalysts 0.4SZ and 0.6SZ exhibit the maximum surface areas of 2193 and 2011 m 2 /g, which are much higher than that of 0.8SZ (1681 m 2 /g), implying that excessive Sn introduction may destroy partial framework structures and cause the decreased surface area.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%