2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.04.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amount and Characteristics of Speaking and Singing Voice Use in Vocally Healthy Female College Student Singers During a Typical Week

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings for the main effects largely replicated results from previous studies. First, with respect to phonation type, results showing that singers spend significantly more time speaking than singing in a typical week and that singing is produced with higher and more variable levels of SPL, f 0 , and H 1 -H 2 , completely corroborates results from a previous ambulatory monitoring study of vocally healthy student singers (Toles et al, 2020). Findings in the present investigation of lower and less variable values for CPP in singing are also in agreement with this previous work.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Findings for the main effects largely replicated results from previous studies. First, with respect to phonation type, results showing that singers spend significantly more time speaking than singing in a typical week and that singing is produced with higher and more variable levels of SPL, f 0 , and H 1 -H 2 , completely corroborates results from a previous ambulatory monitoring study of vocally healthy student singers (Toles et al, 2020). Findings in the present investigation of lower and less variable values for CPP in singing are also in agreement with this previous work.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Findings in the present investigation of lower and less variable values for CPP in singing are also in agreement with this previous work. Toles et al (2020) noted that the results for SPL and f 0 were expected based on obvious perceptual differences between singing and speech and that increased levels and variability of these parameters is indicative of the higher demands that singing places on the vocal system. However, the authors went on to suggest that the somewhat unexpected findings Table 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Frames of the raw acceleration signal were classified as containing singing or speech using an objective singing classifier (Ortiz et al, 2019;Toles et al, 2020Toles et al, , 2021. To address our research aims, only voiced frames classified as speech were analyzed.…”
Section: Ambulatory Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the studies listed here performed a multi-sensor analysis, a significant number of researchers have studied the singing voice with the use of solely accelerometers, which can be employed for the examination of various voice-related measures, such as fundamental frequency, open quotient, glottal airflow [ 27 ], and subglottal pressure [ 28 ], that are traditionally captured with a microphone, an EGG, or airflow measurement devices. Accelerometers have also been used in ambulatory voice monitors for analysis of singers’ vocal qualities, vocal habits, phonotrauma risk assessment [ 29 , 30 ], and detection and classification of singing [ 31 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%