“…Moreover, the detection limit obtained with our biosensor is lower than most of the ones reported in Table 2. In fact, our detection limits are lower than that that reported for biosensors based on non-covalently functionalized carbon nanotubes with 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dione (300 µM) , diphenylalanine peptide/carbon nanotube composite (12 µM) , nickel oxide nanoparticles (6.4 µM) , reduced graphene oxide functionalized with polydopamine and gold nanoparticles (88 µM) , screen-printed electrodes modified with a graphitized mesoporous carbon/chitosan/meldola`s blue/NAD + nanobiocomposite (80 µM) , platinum nanoparticles/dendritic hyperbranched carboxilane polymer nanobiocomposite (451.6 µM) (Jiménez et al, 2014); and comparable to that obtained for electrogenerated NAD + oxidation product immobilized onto carbon nanotubes/ionic liquid nanocomposite ( The GCE/SWCNT-Polytyr(oxidized)/ADH/Naf biosensor was used to quantify the content of ethanol in commercial alcoholic drinks. The concentrations of ethanol in the different beverages are the following: beer 1 (5.0 ± 0.1) %v/v, beer 2 (4.9 ± 0.1) %v/v, mixed drink (6.6 ± 0.2) %v/v, and white wine (13.6 ± 0.2) %v/v, demonstrating an excellent correlation with the values reported by the suppliers (4.9, 5.0, 6.5, and 13.5 % v/v, respectively).…”