1983
DOI: 10.1016/s0163-1047(83)90654-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amphetamine, conditioned stimulus, and nondebilitating preshock effects on activity and avoidance: Further evidence for interactions between associative and nonassociative changes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This release appears to be specifically induced by intraspecific fighting, a form of psychosocial stress (25). An extensive series of experiments using a different stressful condition-i.e., inescapable footshock treatment (26,27) (number of shocks, 5-100; intensity, 0.1-5 mA; duration, 1-60 sec; intershock interval, 15-600 sec; 1 or 3 days of treatment)-failed to evidence any NGF release into the blood. Moreover, another series of tests using stresses such as cold water swimming, forced immobilization, and forced biting yield similarly negative results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This release appears to be specifically induced by intraspecific fighting, a form of psychosocial stress (25). An extensive series of experiments using a different stressful condition-i.e., inescapable footshock treatment (26,27) (number of shocks, 5-100; intensity, 0.1-5 mA; duration, 1-60 sec; intershock interval, 15-600 sec; 1 or 3 days of treatment)-failed to evidence any NGF release into the blood. Moreover, another series of tests using stresses such as cold water swimming, forced immobilization, and forced biting yield similarly negative results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is missing is an automated and reliable learning paradigm for mice that can be adapted to a variety of learning tasks (e.g., detection, discrimination, generalization, transfer learning), showing that learning rules derived from human studies apply to mice. The shuttle-box seems to be the appropriate learning apparatus because it has been used successfully in simple learning and stimulus detection tasks in mice (12)(13)(14)(15) and in complex auditory discrimination and memory tasks in another rodent species, the Mongolian gerbil (7,8,(16)(17)(18)(19). Hence, we designed our present study (i) to test the usefulness of the shuttle-box discrimination learning for simple and complex auditory learning tasks in mice; (ii) to investigate complex auditory learning and discrimination performance in mice to see whether mouse data may be generalized, at least to gerbils; and (iii) to test for stimulus generalization and knowledge transfer across different stimulus classes, experiments that have not been done in the auditory domain in mammals other than humans (3,20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esse fenômeno foi, posteriormente, observado em diversas espécies (Lubow, 1989) como ratos (Baker & Mercier, 1982;Lubow et al, 1976), coelhos (Siegal, 1969), humanos (Baruch et al, 1988;Braunstein-Bercovitz & Lubow, 1998;Byrom et al, 2018;Forrest et al, 2018;Gray et al, 2001). Bem como, em outros delineamentos experimentais, como esquiva (Alleva et al, 1983;Hellman et al, 1983), supressão condicionada (Grahame et al, 1994;Siegel & Domjan, 1971), desvalorização do reforço (De la Casa et al, 2018), aversão condicionada ao sabor (Domjan, 1972;Garcia & Koelling, 1967), discriminação simples (Halgren, 1974).…”
Section: Capítulo I-um Novo Procedimento Para Estudar Inibição Latent...unclassified