2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amphibian and reptile communities of upland and riparian sites across Indonesian oil palm, rubber and forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2018; Paoletti et al . 2018). Water is also a key resource for many forest reptiles, mammals and birds, for drinking, feeding and resting (Hawes et al .…”
Section: What Role Can Vegetation Corridors and Other Semi‐natural Elmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2018; Paoletti et al . 2018). Water is also a key resource for many forest reptiles, mammals and birds, for drinking, feeding and resting (Hawes et al .…”
Section: What Role Can Vegetation Corridors and Other Semi‐natural Elmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-riparian (well-drained) sites were on well-drained soils, whereas the riparian sites were flooded during the rainy season approximately from October until February. The plots were 50 × 50 m. More details on the design of the study are given in Drescher et al (2016) and Paoletti et al (2018).…”
Section: Study Sites and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, changes in biodiversity and ecosystem functioning related to the conversion of tropical lowland forests into agricultural production systems have been little studied. Especially periodically flooded riparian areas with reduced agricultural output, but presumably high conservation value, received little attention (Naiman et al, 1993;Paoletti et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the fact that the great majority of snakebites worldwide occur in tropical areas is not a result of a higher frequency of venomous species within the snake assemblages, but rather is due to other factors (for instance, the higher number of people working in rural/forested areas or snakes are just more abundant in general nearby human settlements and therefore come into contact with people more often). Concerning this latter hypothesis, however, it should be considered that snake assemblage structure changes with anthropogenic changes to the landscape, particularly to agriculture, with some species becoming more common but many becoming rarer [18][19][20]]. In some cases, some venomous species (such as Bothrops asper or Naja nigricollis) will be positively impacted by agriculture, but in others, non-MIVS species (especially pythons like Python regius or Python reticulatus) appear to be the beneficiaries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%