2018
DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.753.21094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amphibians and reptiles of the state of San Luis Potosí, Mexico, with comparisons with adjoining states

Abstract: A summary of the species of amphibians and reptiles of the state has been compiled, including their geographic distributions, habitats, and conservation statuses. The herpetofauna of San Luis Potosí consists of 41 species of amphibians and 141 species of reptiles. San Luis Potosí shares the highest number of species with Hidalgo and Tamaulipas, and the least number of species with Nuevo León. In San Luis Potosí, there are several taxa of particular conservation concern including salamanders, emydid and trionyc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
10
0
9

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The arrangement of the amphibian names follows Frost (2015) and arrangement of the reptile names follows Uetz and Hošek (2015) . State lists used to compare the species composition between Coahuila and the adjoining states were: Lemos-Espinal and Smith (2015a : Chihuahua); Valdez-Lares et al (2013 : Durango); Lemos-Espinal and Dixon (2013 : San Luis Potosí); Lemos-Espinal and Cruz (2015 : Nuevo León); Dixon (2015 : Texas). We modified the list provided by Valdez-Lares et al (2013) to be able to compare it with the list of the rest of the states.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The arrangement of the amphibian names follows Frost (2015) and arrangement of the reptile names follows Uetz and Hošek (2015) . State lists used to compare the species composition between Coahuila and the adjoining states were: Lemos-Espinal and Smith (2015a : Chihuahua); Valdez-Lares et al (2013 : Durango); Lemos-Espinal and Dixon (2013 : San Luis Potosí); Lemos-Espinal and Cruz (2015 : Nuevo León); Dixon (2015 : Texas). We modified the list provided by Valdez-Lares et al (2013) to be able to compare it with the list of the rest of the states.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we recorded the conservation status of each species based on three sources: 1) the IUCN Red List 2014; 2) Environmental Viability Scores from Wilson et al (2013a,b); 3) listing in SEMARNAT (2010). For those neighboring states for which a recent checklist exists (Coahuila: Lemos-Espinal and Smith 2007; San Luis Potosí: Lemos-Espinal and Dixon 2013; Tamaulipas: Farr 2015; and Texas: Dixon 2015), we determined the number of overlapping species.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its size, the data available concerning its herpetofauna is very scarce, thereby constituting an information gap about the species distributed in the region; Flores-Villela and García-Vázquez (2014) and Lemos-Espinal et al (2018) underlined the lack of studies and species lists of herpetofauna in Zacatecas. By contrast, neighboring states have complete works on their amphibians and reptiles, such as Aguascalientes: Vázquez-Díaz and Quintero-Díaz 2005 ; Coahuila: Lemos-Espinal and Smith 2016a ; Durango: Valdez Lares et al 2013 , Lemos-Espinal et al 2018a , Lemos-Espinal et al 2019 ; Guanajuato: Elizalde-Arellano et al 2014; Jalisco: Chávez-Avila et al 2015 ; Nayarit: Luja et al 2014 , Woolrich-Pina et al 2016 ; Nuevo León: Lazcano-Villarreal 1997 ; Lazcano-Villarreal et al 2010 ; Lemos-Espinal et al 2016b ; Lemos-Espinal et al 2018b ; and San Luis Potosí: Lemos-Espinal et al 2018c .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%