“…These low T TiZ temperatures probably suggest that PDL zircons crystallized under lower solidus temperature conditions associated with water-rich magmas (Fu et al, 2008), or their parental magmas have undergone the fractionation of amphibole before the zircon crystallization (see Section 5.1.2). The fractionation of amphibole could efficiently drove the melt compositions to lower TiO 2 concentrations (Davidson et al, 2007), and thus depleted the available Ti budget for the later crystallized zircons, and resulting in zircons with lower Ti concentrations and lower calculated zircon T Tiz values. Additionally, the Ti-in-zircon thermometer may actually underestimate true crystallization temperatures (Fu et al, 2009) owing to the uncertainties in inferred activities of SiO 2 and TiO 2 , effect of pressure correction, subsolidus resetting of Ti compositions, non-Henry's Law substitution of Ti in zircon, disequilibrium crystallization from melts, and thus PDL zircons may have formed at even higher temperatures.…”