2004
DOI: 10.1295/polymj.36.182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amphiphilic Poly(ε-caprolactone)–Poly(vinyl alcohol) Block Copolymer: Preparation from a Bifunctional Initiator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when the [ϵ‐CL]/[PHpr10] composition ratio was greater than 50, the block copolymers also exhibited a decreasing melting temperature ( T m ) in the range of 53–45 °C with the increasing length of the PCL block. T m of the copolymers was slightly lower than that of PCL ( T m = 60 °C),29 indicating that the presence of PHpr blocks decreased the crystallinity of the copolymer with respect to the PCL homopolymer. Similar results were observed in the macroinitiator PHpr30 system: T g was −47 and T m was 45 °C when the molar ratio of [ϵ‐CL]/[PHpr30] = 96/1 was used (copolymer PCL‐ b ‐PHpr10‐ b ‐PCL10).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, when the [ϵ‐CL]/[PHpr10] composition ratio was greater than 50, the block copolymers also exhibited a decreasing melting temperature ( T m ) in the range of 53–45 °C with the increasing length of the PCL block. T m of the copolymers was slightly lower than that of PCL ( T m = 60 °C),29 indicating that the presence of PHpr blocks decreased the crystallinity of the copolymer with respect to the PCL homopolymer. Similar results were observed in the macroinitiator PHpr30 system: T g was −47 and T m was 45 °C when the molar ratio of [ϵ‐CL]/[PHpr30] = 96/1 was used (copolymer PCL‐ b ‐PHpr10‐ b ‐PCL10).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This is due to the fact that the copolymers have a higher molecular weight when larger amounts of ε‐CL are incorporated into the macromolecular backbone, causing a decrease in T g , and an increased in T m s. The existence of two melting temperature very close together might be the primary and secondary crystallization of PCL. However, the T m of the copolymers was slightly lower than that of the PCL ( T m = 58.3°C),31 indicating that the presence of MPEG 12 ‐ b ‐PBOCL blocks decreases the crystallinity of the copolymer with respect to the PCL homopolymer by reducing the PCL chain mobility. The crystallinity of PCL is suppressed when its molecular weight is too low for MPEG 12 ‐ b ‐PBOCL 27 ‐ b ‐PCL 8 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, when the composition ratio of [3-CL]/[PHpr10] beyond 23, the block copolymers also exhibited a T m in the range 52-56 8C and a T c decreased from 36 to K11 8C with increasing the length of PCL block. The T m of the copolymers were slightly lower than the PCL (T m Z60 8C) [24], indicating that the presence of PHpr blocks decreased the crystallinity of the copolymer with respect to the PCL homopolymer. Fig.…”
Section: Synthesis and Characterization Of Phpr10-b-pcl Copolymersmentioning
confidence: 90%