2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.01.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amphoteric ion-exchange membranes with superior mono-/bi-valent anion separation performance for electrodialysis applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure , in terms of running time, it was clearly observed that perm selectivity peaked within 20–30 min, then dropped rapidly, and leveled off after 90 min. Similar trends have been observed in the ED process involving ion exchange membranes. , The high current density increased the ion flux, which accelerated the emergence of the perm-selective peak. However, ion exchange membranes are usually dense polymers, while MOF membranes are porous materials.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Figure , in terms of running time, it was clearly observed that perm selectivity peaked within 20–30 min, then dropped rapidly, and leveled off after 90 min. Similar trends have been observed in the ED process involving ion exchange membranes. , The high current density increased the ion flux, which accelerated the emergence of the perm-selective peak. However, ion exchange membranes are usually dense polymers, while MOF membranes are porous materials.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Similar trends have been observed in the ED process involving ion exchange membranes. 53,54 The high current density increased the ion flux, which accelerated the emergence of the perm-selective peak. However, ion exchange membranes are usually dense polymers, while MOF membranes are porous materials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Cl – and SO 4 2– can be separated by a G5-PS/PIP membrane efficiently. In view of both improved treatment efficiency and selectivity to low/high-valent co-ions, the PA membrane based pressure-driven membrane separation technology shows a great possibility to replace the traditional separation technologies such as ion exchange membrane based electrodialysis technology, as selectivity of the state-of-the-art ion exchange membranes to Na + /Mg 2+ and Cl – /SO 4 2– are always below 20. , Considering that the ion separation performance is dependent on the concentration of the feed solution, low/high-valent co-ion selectivity of the ionic PAMAM dendrimer based PA membranes in feed solution with different concentrations was investigated. With increasing feed solution concentration (mass concentration ratios of both NaCl to MgCl 2 and NaCl to Na 2 SO 4 were fixed at 1:1), the enhanced electrostatic screening effect leads to a reduced membrane charge density and thus weaker electrostatic repulsion for ions, resulting in a decrease of low/high-valent co-ion selectivity (Figure S16).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some undesirable side effects like water splitting or electrical convection will cause significant degradation of the membrane performance when the current density reaches the over‐limited stage. [ 49 ] When applied current is above the I lim, ion concentration near the boundary layers tend to increase sharply, which result in a severe concentration polarization. Figure 6b and Table 3 show the current–voltage curves of the prepared AEMs, the limiting current density of G‐PEDG‐PDA membrane was 12.33 mA cm −2 in 0.05 m NaCl solution, which was the lowest among the tested membranes.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%