2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amphoteric surfactant promoted three-dimensional assembly of graphene micro/nanoclusters to accomodate Pt nanoparticles for methanol oxidation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of the graphene-Pt NP hybrid, the onset potential for methanol oxidation was observed to be located at 0.40 V, and the oxidation forward and reverse peaks of methanol were located at 0.87 and 0.66 V, respectively. The graphene-Pt NP hybrid exhibited a forward peak current (jF H2SO4 on Table 1) of 1141 A g -1 , which is similar to the highest values that have been reported for RGO-Pt NP catalysts [52][53][54]58,63,64], and it was higher than those achieved using pristine graphene as support [31][32][33] and comparable to those achieved using bi-and tri-metallic NPs over pristine graphene [29]. The forward oxidation current to reverse current ratio (IF/IB on Table 1) describes the catalyst tolerance to CO-like intermediates that are formed on the surface of the catalyst during the forward CV sweep [10].…”
Section: Electrocatalytic Activity Of the Graphene-metal Np Hybrids Tsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of the graphene-Pt NP hybrid, the onset potential for methanol oxidation was observed to be located at 0.40 V, and the oxidation forward and reverse peaks of methanol were located at 0.87 and 0.66 V, respectively. The graphene-Pt NP hybrid exhibited a forward peak current (jF H2SO4 on Table 1) of 1141 A g -1 , which is similar to the highest values that have been reported for RGO-Pt NP catalysts [52][53][54]58,63,64], and it was higher than those achieved using pristine graphene as support [31][32][33] and comparable to those achieved using bi-and tri-metallic NPs over pristine graphene [29]. The forward oxidation current to reverse current ratio (IF/IB on Table 1) describes the catalyst tolerance to CO-like intermediates that are formed on the surface of the catalyst during the forward CV sweep [10].…”
Section: Electrocatalytic Activity Of the Graphene-metal Np Hybrids Tsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Current retentions of 23, 5 and 2 % were measured after 30 min for the graphene-Pt NP, graphene-Pd NP(1) and graphene-Pd NP(2) catalysts, respectively. The specific current retained by the graphene-Pt NP hybrid after 30 minutes was in most cases higher than or at least amongst the highest of those recorded for similar catalysts reported in the literature [54,63,64]. However, it is important to note that most of the mentioned graphene-Pt NP catalytic stability tests were conducted in acidic media.…”
Section: Electrocatalytic Activity Of the Graphene-metal Np Hybrids Tmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…2A and Fig. The D/G intensity ratio increases from GO to 3DGN, which is due to the defects introduced into the 3DGN during reduction 50,51 . The Raman spectra of GO and 3DGN were shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Furthermore, as-prepared graphene by this way usually shows poor dispersibility in aqueous solution due to agglomerate irreversibly through van der Waals interactions [24]. In view of these aspects, the methods of developing eco-friendly, simple operation and easy to disperse graphene are expected to create more opportunity for biological sensing applications [25]. Fortunately, researches found that using poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) (PDDA), a positively charged polyelectrolyte being used as the dispersing agent and stabilizer, was conducive to obtain the hydrosoluble graphene sheets [26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%