2001
DOI: 10.1086/322330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amplification, Saturation, andQThresholds for Runaway: Growth of Self‐Gravitating Structures in Models of Magnetized Galactic Gas Disks

Abstract: We investigate the susceptibility of gaseous, magnetized galactic disks to the formation of selfgravitating condensations using two-dimensional, local models. We focus on two issues : (1) determining the threshold condition for gravitational runaway, taking into account nonlinear e †ects ; and (2) distinguishing the magneto-Jeans instability (MJI) that arises under inner galaxy rotation curves from the modiÐed swing ampliÐcation (MSA) that arises under outer galaxy rotation curves. For axisymmetric density Ñuc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
152
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(152 reference statements)
8
152
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Direct feedback from starbursts may play only a minor role in quenching subsequent star formation (e.g., Kravtsov 2003;Monaco 2004), perhaps because most energy is deposited not in the disk, but above it as superbubbles blow out (e.g., Fujita et al 2003;Avillez & Breitschwerdt 2004). Kim & Ostriker (2001) demonstrate that swing and magneto-Jeans instabilities operating in a gaseous disk occur at , suggesting that mag-Q ∼ 1.4 g netostatic support is unimportant. The lack of gas recycling both from disrupted molecular clouds and from massive stars will change the detailed patterns of star formation, but probably not the overall results.…”
Section: Star Formation Thresholdmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Direct feedback from starbursts may play only a minor role in quenching subsequent star formation (e.g., Kravtsov 2003;Monaco 2004), perhaps because most energy is deposited not in the disk, but above it as superbubbles blow out (e.g., Fujita et al 2003;Avillez & Breitschwerdt 2004). Kim & Ostriker (2001) demonstrate that swing and magneto-Jeans instabilities operating in a gaseous disk occur at , suggesting that mag-Q ∼ 1.4 g netostatic support is unimportant. The lack of gas recycling both from disrupted molecular clouds and from massive stars will change the detailed patterns of star formation, but probably not the overall results.…”
Section: Star Formation Thresholdmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In spiral galaxies, the presence of toroidal magnetic fields is known to play a destabilizing role in forming giant clouds inside spiral arms where tension forces from bent field lines resist the stabilizing effect of the Coriolis force (e.g., Balbus 1988; Kim & Ostriker 2001. In addition, magnetic fields are likely to reduce the degree of central density concentration by exerting pressure forces.…”
Section: Mazzucamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has led to the suspicion that the formation of stars depends on the formation of molecular hydrogen (Schaye 2004;Krumholz & McKee 2005;Elmegreen 2007;Krumholz et al 2009b). However, the opposite view has also been argued: that molecular clouds and then stars form from converging flows (Ballesteros-Paredes et al 1999;Koyama & Inutsuka 2000;Hartmann et al 2001;Vázquez-Semadeni et al 2006; Ballesteros-Paredes e 2007; Hennebelle et al 2008;Heitsch & Hartmann 2008;Inoue & Inutsuka 2009), primarily driven by large-scale gravitational instability (Rafikov 2001;Kim & Ostriker 2001;Elmegreen 2002;Kravtsov 2003;Dalcanton et al 2004;Mac Low & Klessen 2004;Li et al 2005Li et al , 2006Shetty & Ostriker 2008;Ostriker et al 2010). In this picture, the formation of molecules is a consequence, not a cause, of the conditions required to form stars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%