1992
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.89.10.4309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amplified and rearranged epidermal growth factor receptor genes in human glioblastomas reveal deletions of sequences encoding portions of the N- and/or C-terminal tails.

Abstract: This study describes genomic rearrangements near the 3' end of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene in eight glioblastomas displaying coamplification and expression of both normal and rearranged EGFR. In four of these cases, it was possible by PCR to amplify tumor EGFR cDNA, which allowed sequence determination of the 3' transcript alterations associated with the rearrangements. Such analysis revealed that the four cases have in common a deletion of 255 bases that encode a portion of the receptor's… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

10
351
1
9

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 552 publications
(371 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
10
351
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Intriguingly, unlike wild‐type EGFR, our data clearly demonstrate that tyrosine phosphorylation‐impaired CYF10 EGFR mutants are still able to transform NIH‐3T3 and Ba/F3 cells, suggesting that constitutive phosphorylation on mutant EGFR may be dispensable for their transforming potential. These paradoxical results are consistent with our reports that a subset of mutant EGFR is capable of cellular transformation irrespective of asymmetric dimerization16 and that various C‐terminal intragenic deletion mutants identified in glioblastomas and lung adenocarcinoma are oncogenic 29, 30. Furthermore, an Ex19Del mutant was shown to retain its oncogenic activity in the absence of the C‐terminal domain or autophosphorylation,23, 24 putatively through heterodimerization of phosphorylated ErbB3 with C‐terminal domain deleted Ex19Del.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Intriguingly, unlike wild‐type EGFR, our data clearly demonstrate that tyrosine phosphorylation‐impaired CYF10 EGFR mutants are still able to transform NIH‐3T3 and Ba/F3 cells, suggesting that constitutive phosphorylation on mutant EGFR may be dispensable for their transforming potential. These paradoxical results are consistent with our reports that a subset of mutant EGFR is capable of cellular transformation irrespective of asymmetric dimerization16 and that various C‐terminal intragenic deletion mutants identified in glioblastomas and lung adenocarcinoma are oncogenic 29, 30. Furthermore, an Ex19Del mutant was shown to retain its oncogenic activity in the absence of the C‐terminal domain or autophosphorylation,23, 24 putatively through heterodimerization of phosphorylated ErbB3 with C‐terminal domain deleted Ex19Del.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Amplification and͞or alteration of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) gene is frequently observed in glial tumor progression (1,2), particularly in glioblastoma, the most malignant glial tumor (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8). A significant proportion of these tumors show EGFr amplification with or without gene alteration (2)(3)(4), and this has been correlated with a shorter interval to disease recurrence and poorer survival (8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant proportion of these tumors show EGFr amplification with or without gene alteration (2)(3)(4), and this has been correlated with a shorter interval to disease recurrence and poorer survival (8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, geographic (ethnic) differences in detection of the EGFR mutation may result in variability. The results of previous studies (30,34,42,(61)(62)(63)(64)(65)(66) showed that there were significant differences in the sites and main types of EGFR mutations in different races and regions. Most of the specimens in this study came from Shandong, China.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%