2021
DOI: 10.1088/2040-8986/ac213e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amplified sensing of optical phase difference through the phase of the resultant field

Abstract: A generalized scheme to enhance the sensitivity in the measurement of phase difference in an optical interference by measuring the phase of the resultant field is presented. In the proposed scheme, the weak measurement in scalar optical interferometry is achieved by directly accessing the phase of the output state, rather than looking at the centroid shift in the intensity. The spatial confinement or beam-like characteristics for the optical field, an essential criterion for centroid calculation, is not a requ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Where πœ™ 12 = πœ™ 1 βˆ’ πœ™ 2 , the phase difference between the individual phases πœ™ 1 and πœ™ 2 , of interfering fields 𝐸 1 (πœ”) and 𝐸 2 (πœ”). The phase of the superposed field 𝐸 𝑆 = 𝐸 1 (πœ”) + 𝐸 2 (πœ”) varies with path delay, according to the ratio of amplitudes of interfering beam 𝛼 = |𝐸 1 |/|𝐸 2 | and the beam which is phase shifted as discussed in 7 . To study the phase variation an additional field 𝐸 3 (πœ”) is required.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where πœ™ 12 = πœ™ 1 βˆ’ πœ™ 2 , the phase difference between the individual phases πœ™ 1 and πœ™ 2 , of interfering fields 𝐸 1 (πœ”) and 𝐸 2 (πœ”). The phase of the superposed field 𝐸 𝑆 = 𝐸 1 (πœ”) + 𝐸 2 (πœ”) varies with path delay, according to the ratio of amplitudes of interfering beam 𝛼 = |𝐸 1 |/|𝐸 2 | and the beam which is phase shifted as discussed in 7 . To study the phase variation an additional field 𝐸 3 (πœ”) is required.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a > 1, the phase values keep increasing beyond p 2 which in turn gets wrapped up between the range [ ] p p -, .Hence the phase is unwrapped to obtain a variation as shown in figure2(c). The distinct behaviour of the phase for the two settings of Ξ± hints at the lifting of degeneracy in contribution to phase from f 1 and f 2 as described in equation (5)[16].To study the nonlinearity in the phase accumulated by the superposed field, the spectral intensities| | E s 2obtained from the simulation for the path delay l figure 3(a) are analysed. The amplitude ratio Ξ± is set to 1.02.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%