Amplitude Analysis of 
<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>π</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>π</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>η</mml:mi></mml:math>
 and First Observation of the 
<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math>
-Annihilation Domin

Ablikim, M.; Ачасов, М. Н.; Ahmed, S.; Albrecht, M.; Alekseev, M.; Amoroso, A.; An, F. F.; An, Q.; Bai, J. Z.; Bai, Y.; Bakina, O.; Ferroli, R. Baldini; Ban, Y.; Begzsuren, K.; Bennett, J. V.; Berger, N.; Bertani, M.; Bettoni, D.; Bianchi, F.; Boger, E.; Boyko, I. R.; Briere, R. A.; Cai, H.; Cai, X.; Calcaterra, A.; Cao, G. F.; Cao, N.; Çetin, S. A.; Chai, J.; Chang, J. F.; Chelkov, G. A.; Chen, G; Chen, H S; Chen, J C; Chen, M L; Chen, S J; Chen, X R; Chen, Y B; Cheng, W. S.; Chu, X. K.; Cibinetto, G.; Cossio, F.; Cui, X. F.; Dai, H. L.; Dai, J. P.; Dbeyssi, A.; Dedovich, D. V.; Deng, Z. Y.; Denig, A.; Denysenko, I.; Destefanis, M.; Mori, F. De; Ding, Y.; Dong, C.; Dong, J.; Dong, L. Y.; Dong, M. Y.; Du, S. X.; Fang, J.; Fang, S. S.; Fang, Y.; Farinelli, R.; Fava, L.; Feldbauer, F.; Felici, G.; Feng, C. Q.; Fritsch, M.; Fu, C. D.; Gao, Q.; Gao, X. L.; Gao, Y.; Gao, Yang; Gao, Z.; Garillon, B.; Garzia, I.; Gilman, A.; Goetzen, K.; Gong, L.; Gong, W. X.; Gradl, W.; Greco, M.; Gu, M. H.; Gu, Y. T.; Guo, A. Q.; Guo, R. P.; Guo, Y. P.; Guskov, A.; Han, S.; Hao, X. Q.; Harris, F. A.; He, K. L.; He, X. Q.; Heinsius, F. H.; Held, T.; Heng, Y. K.; Hou, Y. R.; Hou, Z. L.; Hu, H. M.; Hu, J.; Hu, T.; Hu, Y.; Huang, G. S.; Huang, J. S.; Huang, X. T.; Huang, Z.; Hussain, T.; Andersson, W. Ikegami; Imoehl, W.; Irshad, M.; Ji, Q.; Ji, X. B.; Ji, X. L.; Jiang, X. S.; Jiang, X. Y.; Jiao, J. B.; Jiao, Z.; Jin, D. P.; Jin, S.; Jin, Y.; Johansson, T.; Kalantar‐Nayestanaki, N.; Kang, X. S.; Kappert, R.; Kavatsyuk, M.; Ke, B. C.; Keshk, I. K.; Khan, Tabassum; Khoukaz, A.; Kiese, P.; Kiuchi, R.; Kliemt, R.; Koch, L.; Kolcu, O. B.; Kopf, B.; Kuemmel, M.; Kuessner, M.; Kupść, A.; Kurth, M. G.; Kühn, W.; Lange, J. S.; Larin, P.; Lavezzi, L.; Leithoff, H.; Li, C; Li, Cheng; Li, D M; Li, F; Li, F Y; Li, H B; Li, J C; Li, J W; Li, Jin; Li, K J; Li, Kang; Li, Ké; Li, L K; Li, Lei; Li, P L; Li, P R; Li, Q Y; Li, W D; Li, W G; Li, X L; Li, X N; Li, X Q; Li, Z B; Liang, H.; Liang, Y. F.; Liang, Y. T.; Liao, G. R.; Liao, L. Z.; Libby, J.; Lin, C. X.; Lin, D. X.; Liu, B; Liu, B J; Liu, C X; Liu, D; Liu, D Y; Liu, F H; Liu, Fang; Liu, Feng; Liu, H B; Liu, H M; Liu, Huan-Huan; Liu, Huihui; Liu, J B; Liu, J Y; Liu, K Y; Liu, Ke; Liu, L D; Liu, Q; Liu, S B; Liu, X; Liu, X Y; Liu, Y B; Liu, Z A; Liu, Zhiqing; Long, Y. F.; Lou, X.; Lü, H. J.; Lu, J. G.; Lu, Y. P.; Luo, C. L.; Luo, M. X.; Luo, T.; Luo, X. L.; Lusso, S.; Lyu, X. R.; C, F; L, H; L, L; M, M; M, Q; Ma, Tian; N, X; Y, X; M, Y; Maas, F. E.; Maggiora, M.; Maldaner, S.; Malik, Q. A.; Mangoni, A.; Mao, Y. J.; Mao, Z. P.; Marcello, S.; Meng, Z.; Messchendorp, J. G.; Mezzadri, G.; Min, J.; Mitchell, R. E.; Mo, X. H.; Mo, Y. J.; Morales, C. Morales; Muchnoi, N. Yu.; Muramatsu, H.; Mustafa, A.; Nefedov, Y.; Nerling, F.; Nikolaev, I. B.; Ning, Z.; Nisar, S.; Niu, S. L.; Niu, X. Y.; Olsen, S. L.; Ouyang, Q.; Pacetti, S.; Pan, Y.; Papenbrock, M.; Patterí, P.; Pelizaeus, M.; Pellegrino, J.; Peng, H.; Peters, K.; Pettersson, J.; Ping, J. L.; Ping, R. G.; Pitka, A.; Poling, R.; Prasad, V.; Qi, M.; Qi, T. Y.; Qian, S. J.; Qiao, C. F.; Qin, N.; Qin, X. S.; Qin, Z. H.; Qiu, J. F.; Qu, S. Q.; Rashid, K. H.; Redmer, C. F.; Richter, Markus; Ripka, M.; Rivetti, A.; Rodin, V.; Rolo, M.; Rong, G.; Rosner, Ch.; Sarantsev, A.; Savrié, M.; Schoenning, K.; Shan, W.; Shan, X. Y.; Shao, M.; Shen, C. P.; Shen, P. X.; Shen, X. Y.; Sheng, H. Y.; Shi, X.; Song, J. J.; Song, X. Y.; Sosio, S.; Sowa, C.; Spataro, S.; Sun, G. X.; Sun, J. F.; Sun, L.; Sun, S. S.; Sun, X. H.; Sun, Y. J.; Sun, Y. K.; Sun, Y. Z.; Sun, Z. J.; Sun, Z. T.; Tan, Y. T.; Tang, C. J.; Tang, G. Y.; Tang, X.; Tsednee, B.; Uman, I.; Wang, B; Wang, D; Wang, D Y; Wang, K; Wang, L L; Wang, L S; Wang, M; Wang, Meng; Wang, P; Wang, P L; Wang, W P; Wang, X L; Wang, Y; Wang, Y F; Wang, Z; Wang, Z G; Wang, Z Y; Wang, Zongyuan; Weber, T.; Wei, D. H.; Weidenkaff, P.; Wen, S. P.; Wiedner, U.; Wolke, M.; Wu, L. H.; Wu, L. J.; Wu, Z.; Xia, L.; Xia, Y.; Xiao, S. Y.; Xiao, Y. J.; Xiao, Z. J.; Xie, Y.; Xie, Y.; Xiong, X. A.; Xiu, Q. L.; Xu, G. F.; Xu, Jingyi; Li, Xu; Xu, Q. J.; Xu, X. P.; Yan, F.; Yan, L.; Yan, W. B.; Yan, W. C.; Yan, Y. H.; Yang, H. J.; Yang, H. X.; Yang, L.; Yang, R. X.; Yang, Yifan; Yang, Yifan; Yang, Z.; Ye, M; Ye, M H; Yin, J. H.; Zhou, You; Yu, B. X.; Yu, C. X.; Yu, J. S.; Yuan, C. Z.; Yuan, Y.; Yuncu, A.; Zafar, A. A.; Zeng, Y.; Zhang, B X; Zhang, B Y; Zhang, C C; Zhang, D H; Zhang, H H; Zhang, H Y; Zhang, J; Zhang, J L; Zhang, J Q; Zhang, J Y; Zhang, K; Zhang, L; Zhang, T J; Zhang, X Y; Zhang, Y; Zhang, Y H; Zhang, Y T; Zhang, Yang; Zhang, Yao; Zhang, Yi; Zhang, Z H; Zhang, Z P; Zhang, Z Y; Zhao, G.; Zhao, J. W.; Zhao, J.; Zhao, J. Z.; Liu, Zhao; Zhao, Ling; Zhao, M. G.; Zhao, Q.; Zhao, S. J.; Zhao, T. C.; Zhao, Y. B.; Zhao, Z.; Zhemchugov, A.; Zheng, B.; Zheng, J. P.; Zheng, Y.; Zhong, B.; Li, Zhou; Zhou, Q.; Zhou, Xiang; Zhou, X. K.; Zhou, X. R.; Zhou, X. R.; Zhou, X. R.; Zhu, A. N.; Zhu, Jing; Zhu, K. J.; Zhu, S. H.; Zhu, W. J.; Zhu, Xiaoyu; Zhu, Y.; Zhu, Y. S.; Zhu, Z. A.; Zhuang, J.; Zou, B. S.; Zou, J. H.

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.112001

Cited by 23 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For the uncertainty from the integrated yields, the expected yield of peaking background in each phase space region is varied according to a Gaussian distribution. This distribution has the nominal value of the peaking-background yield as the mean, and a width which combines the uncertainties from the BFs of peaking-background decays, and the uncertainties arising from tracking [46], PID [46], and π 0 reconstruction efficiencies [47]. The distributions over the Dalitz plots for peaking backgrounds that are CP eigenstates, or D →…”

Section: Systematic Uncertaintiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Model-independent determination of the relative strong-phase difference between D0 and D¯0→K
Ablikim¹,
Ачасов²,
Adlarson³
et al. 2020
Phys. Rev. D
Self Cite
30
1
11
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Crucial inputs for a variety of CP-violation studies can be determined through the analysis of pairs of quantum-entangled neutral D mesons, which are produced in the decay of the ψð3770Þ resonance. The relative strong-phase parameters between D 0 andD 0 in the decays D 0 → K 0 S;L π þ π − are studied using 2.93 fb −1 of e þ e − annihilation data delivered by the BEPCII collider and collected by the BESIII detector at a center-of-mass energy of 3.773 GeV. Results are presented in regions of the phase space of the decay. These are the most precise measurements to date of the strong-phase parameters in D → K 0 S;L π þ π − decays. Using these parameters, the associated uncertainty on the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa angle γ=ϕ 3 is expected to be between 0.7°and 1.2°for an analysis using the decay B AE → DK AE , D → K 0 S π þ π − , where D represents a superposition of D 0 andD 0 states. This is a factor of 3 smaller than that achievable with previous measurements. Furthermore, these results provide valuable input for charm-mixing studies, other measurements of CP violation, and the measurement of strong-phase parameters for other D-decay modes.

show abstract

Section: Systematic Uncertaintiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Model-independent determination of the relative strong-phase difference between D0 and D¯0→K
Ablikim¹,
Ачасов²,
Adlarson³
et al. 2020
Phys. Rev. D
Self Cite
30
1
11
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The signal shape is described by an MC-simulated 2D probability density function (PDF) convolved with a Gaussian function, whose parameters are derived from the corresponding M sig and M γγ fits, to consider resolution the difference between data and MC simulation. The shapes for various background components are modeled from the inclusive MC samples, where the model for B 3π2π 0 is obtained from the amplitude analyses of the decays D + s → π 0 π + η (η → π 0 π + π − ) [24] and D + s → π 0 π 0 π + π + π − . The yield of B 3π2π 0 is fixed to 152.9 according to the measured BFs, while the yields of B ηX and B other are floating parameters in the fit.…”

Section: Event Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Observation of the decay $D^+_s\to ωπ^+η$

Collaboration¹,

Ablikim²,

Achasov³

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The simulation of inclusive MC samples is described in Ref. [22]. The signal process e þ e − → γXð3872Þ is generated assuming it is a pure electric dipole (E1) transition, and the subsequent Xð3872Þ decays are generated uniformly in the phase space except Xð3872Þ → γJ=ψðγψ 0 Þ, which is generated assuming a pure E1 transition too.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Study of Open-Charm Decays and Radiative Transitions of the X (3872)

Ablikim¹,

Ачасов²,

Adlarson³

et al. 2020

Phys. Rev. Lett.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The processes Xð3872Þ → D Ã0D0 þ c:c:; γJ=ψ; γψð2SÞ, and γD þ D − are searched for in a 9.0 fb −1 data sample collected at center-of-mass energies between 4.178 and 4.278 GeV with the BESIII detector. We observe Xð3872Þ → D Ã0D0 þ c:c: and find evidence for Xð3872Þ → γJ=ψ with statistical significances of 7.4σ and 3.5σ, respectively. No evident signals for Xð3872Þ → γψð2SÞ and γD þ D − are found, and the upper limit on the relative branching ratio R γψ ≡ fB½Xð3872Þ → γψð2SÞg=fB½Xð3872Þ → γJ=ψg < 0.59 is set at 90% confidence level. Measurements of branching ratios relative to decay Xð3872Þ → π þ π − J=ψ are also reported for decays Xð3872Þ → D Ã0D0 þ c:c:; γψð2SÞ; γJ=ψ, and γD þ D − , as well as the non-D Ã0D0 three-body decays π 0 D 0D0 and γD 0D0 .

show abstract

Amplitude Analysis of Ds+→π+π0η and First Observation of the W -Annihilation Domin

Cited by 23 publications

References 22 publications

Model-independent determination of the relative strong-phase difference between D0 and D¯0→K
Ablikim¹,
Ачасов²,
Adlarson³
et al. 2020
Phys. Rev. D
Self Cite
30
1
11
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Model-independent determination of the relative strong-phase difference between D0 and D¯0→K
Ablikim¹,
Ачасов²,
Adlarson³
et al. 2020
Phys. Rev. D
Self Cite
30
1
11
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Observation of the decay $D^+_s\to ωπ^+η$

Study of Open-Charm Decays and Radiative Transitions of the X (3872)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Amplitude Analysis of Ds+→π+π0η and First Observation of the W -Annihilation Domin

Cited by 23 publications

References 22 publications

Model-independent determination of the relative strong-phase difference between D0 and D¯0→KAblikim1, Ачасов2, Adlarson3 et al. 2020Phys. Rev. DSelf Cite301110View full textAdd to dashboardCite

Model-independent determination of the relative strong-phase difference between D0 and D¯0→KAblikim1, Ачасов2, Adlarson3 et al. 2020Phys. Rev. DSelf Cite301110View full textAdd to dashboardCite

Observation of the decay $D^+_s\to ωπ^+η$

Study of Open-Charm Decays and Radiative Transitions of the X (3872)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Model-independent determination of the relative strong-phase difference between D0 and D¯0→K
Ablikim¹,
Ачасов²,
Adlarson³
et al. 2020
Phys. Rev. D
Self Cite
30
1
11
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Model-independent determination of the relative strong-phase difference between D0 and D¯0→K
Ablikim¹,
Ачасов²,
Adlarson³
et al. 2020
Phys. Rev. D
Self Cite
30
1
11
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite