1998
DOI: 10.1080/11035899801201059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AMS14C chronologies of Holocene lake sediments in the Abisko area, northern Sweden – a comparison between dated bulk sediment and macrofossil samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
68
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
68
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent comparisons between dated bulk sediment and macrofossil samples from various lakes often show marked discrepancies, and radiocarbon chronologies from lake sediments are often based on AMS-radiocarbon dated terrestrial plant macrofossils (e.g. Barnekow et al, 1998). However, on certain sites and under certain conditions, AMS dates on terrestrial plant macrofossils are not superior to bulk sediment samples (e.g.…”
Section: Methods Reflecting Glacier Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent comparisons between dated bulk sediment and macrofossil samples from various lakes often show marked discrepancies, and radiocarbon chronologies from lake sediments are often based on AMS-radiocarbon dated terrestrial plant macrofossils (e.g. Barnekow et al, 1998). However, on certain sites and under certain conditions, AMS dates on terrestrial plant macrofossils are not superior to bulk sediment samples (e.g.…”
Section: Methods Reflecting Glacier Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that aquatic plants build into their cellular material the 14 C: 12 C ratio of the lake water (Turney et al, 2000), which may be higher than the atmospheric 14 C: 12 C ratio (MacDonald et al, 1987). This 'hard-water' effect is prominent in areas with carbonate bedrock, but bulk samples of lacustrine sediment may yield anomalously old dates even in soft-water lakes (Old eld et al, 1997;Barnekow et al, 1998).…”
Section: Gyttja Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The four dates of macro ora from mass ow deposits may possibly be older than the actual debris-ow event. The dates of twigs from gyttja may also be problematic, because such plant fragments can rest on the ground or shallowly buried for decades to centuries before being eventually washed into a lake (Barnekow et al, 1998). With the exception of the anomalously young (470-290 cal.…”
Section: Terrestrial Macro Ora Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiocarbon dates were preferably obtained by AMS on terrestrial plant macrofossils in order to avoid problems with lake hardwater (Barnekow et al, 1998) and marine reservoir effects (Mangerud and Gulliksen, 1975). Some dates, however, were obtained from marine molluscs and bulk gyttja samples.…”
Section: Research Strategy and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%