2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12083-021-01100-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AMVchain: authority management mechanism on blockchain-based voting systems

Abstract: As blockchain technology booms, modern electronic voting system leverages blockchain as underlying storage model to make the voting process more transparent, and guarantee immutability of data. However, the transparent characteristic may disclose sensitive information of candidate for all system users have the same right to their information. Besides that, the pseudo-anonymity of blockchain will lead to the disclosure of voters’ privacy and the third-parties such as registration institutions involved in voting… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before studying the working of Blockchain technology in electronic voting, it is important to know the vulnerabilities in today's election in detail. Several parameters may influence any e-voting processes that are as follows [23,24]:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before studying the working of Blockchain technology in electronic voting, it is important to know the vulnerabilities in today's election in detail. Several parameters may influence any e-voting processes that are as follows [23,24]:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…𝑉𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡 = {𝐶 𝑁𝑎𝑚𝑒 , 𝑇𝑜𝑘𝑒𝑛, 𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑒} (30) 𝑉𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔_𝐻𝑎𝑠ℎ = 𝐻𝐴𝑆𝐻(𝑉𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡) = 𝐻𝐴𝑆𝐻(𝐶 𝑁𝑎𝑚𝑒 + 𝑇𝑜𝑘𝑒𝑛 + 𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑒) (31) 𝑉𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔_𝐻𝑎𝑠ℎ`= 𝐸 𝑟 𝑜𝑟 𝑗 (𝑉𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔_𝐻𝑎𝑠ℎ) (32)…”
Section: Second Stage -Votingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the most significant flaws of such mechanisms are the deficiency of transparency and clarity, prominent to diminished trust, the absence of universally recognized standards, the persistent threat of fraud and influence, and the enhanced financial burdens on voting setup. However, blockchain technology [27,30,31] emerges as a promising solution to address these issues. Some of blockchain's fundamental attributes is its capacity to establish a stage for public information verification, thus presenting an opportunity to develop an e-voting mechanism that can be examined by everyday voters rather than relying solely on committed organizations and representatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study of certificate encryption, we have proposed a certificateless blockchain‐oriented cryptographic mechanism that not only improves the security of certificateless encryption but also reduces the storage overhead, but the computational overhead brought by the introduction of blockchain to the certificateless encryption mechanism needs to be further optimized 17 . In terms of ring signature, Li et al 18 applied permission management mechanisms and linkable‐for‐signature to blockchain voting modules, which can protect block data privacy during the voting phase, but the introduction of proxy nodes in this scheme increases the centralization of the system, and its resistance to attack needs to be improved. In the study of zero‐knowledge proof, Yang and Wenjie 19 proposed an identity management method based on zero‐knowledge proof for blockchain, which used off‐chain calculations and verification on the blockchain to separate user entity attributes from public ledger attributes and ensure that the user's identity cannot be linked, but the redundancy and long computation time of this scheme need further optimization.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%