1990
DOI: 10.1137/0727019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An a Posteriori Error Estimate and Adaptive Timestep Control for a Backward Euler Discretization of a Parabolic Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discontinuous Galerkin method dG(q) of order q ≥ 1 is defined as follows [7,8,9,10,11,14,15,16,17,21,14,30]:…”
Section: 3)û + πF(u ) = Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The discontinuous Galerkin method dG(q) of order q ≥ 1 is defined as follows [7,8,9,10,11,14,15,16,17,21,14,30]:…”
Section: 3)û + πF(u ) = Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the approach of [7,8,9,10,11,15,16,17,28], which is based on the strong stability of suitable dual problems, the key novel ingredient of our approach to a posteriori error analysis is a higher order reconstruction U , of degree q + 1, which yields the differential equation (…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In analogy to [1] (see also [11] for the basic idea in a different context and [12] for analogous results for the heat equation), we define for each n, 1 ≤ n ≤ N , the error indicator…”
Section: A Posteriori Analysis Of the Time Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these algorithms are based on a posteriori error estimators which provide appropriate tools for adaptive mesh refinements. The theory of a posteriori analysis of finite element methods for parabolic problems is well-developed (see, e.g., [3,4,19,22,27,29,36,40]). Surprisingly, there has been considerably less work on the error control of finite element methods for second order hyperbolic problems, despite the substantial amount of research in the design of finite element methods for the wave problem (see, e.g., [6,7,8,11,20]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%