2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13019-019-1011-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An abnormal left ventricular-atrial perforation after radiofrequency catheter ablation: a case report

Abstract: BackgroundCardiac radiofrequency ablation is a popular treatment for arrhythmias. However, it does have some complications, some of which are severe, even fatally. And there were limited reports on cardiac internal perforation after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) that required a surgical repair.Case presentationA 47-year-old male was admitted to our hospital due to chest congestion for 4 months. He received a radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) 9 months prior to admission. On admission, an echocar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A surgeon was on standby in the event that the TEE showed perforation that required repair, but this did not happen in our patient. In the majority of patients that develop acute cardiac tamponade following RFCA, emergency pericardiocentesis is sufficient for complete recovery, but an urgent surgical repair may be lifesaving in 15-20% of the cases; raising the question of the safety of the procedure performed without in-house surgical backup [ 18 , 19 ]. In addition to emergency pericardiocentesis, blood was transfused, positive inotropes, and IV fluids were given to hemodynamically stabilize our patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A surgeon was on standby in the event that the TEE showed perforation that required repair, but this did not happen in our patient. In the majority of patients that develop acute cardiac tamponade following RFCA, emergency pericardiocentesis is sufficient for complete recovery, but an urgent surgical repair may be lifesaving in 15-20% of the cases; raising the question of the safety of the procedure performed without in-house surgical backup [ 18 , 19 ]. In addition to emergency pericardiocentesis, blood was transfused, positive inotropes, and IV fluids were given to hemodynamically stabilize our patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%