2008
DOI: 10.1299/jsdd.2.979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ACC Design Method for Achieving Both String Stability and Ride Comfort

Abstract: An investigation was made of a method for designing adaptive cruise control (ACC) so as to achieve a headway distance response that feels natural to the driver while at the same time obtaining high levels of both string stability and ride comfort. With this design method, the H ∞ norm is adopted as the index of string stability. Additionally, two norms are introduced for evaluating ride comfort and natural vehicle behavior. The relationship between these three norms and headway distance response characteristic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to address the combined longitudinal and lateral control, the state-space representation of the IV dynamic system is adopted to build the multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) control models [20][21][22][23][24] . However, the implementation of these MIMO controllers (e.g., prediction control [20] or H ∞ control [25] ) often imposes offline computation and strict constraints in both simulations and experiments. For example, when forming the Hamilton function in the H ∞ control, the feedback factor is often formulated by using Riccati equation or algebraic iteration [25] , which increase the offline computation.…”
Section: Energy Dissipation Based Longitudinal and Lateral Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to address the combined longitudinal and lateral control, the state-space representation of the IV dynamic system is adopted to build the multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) control models [20][21][22][23][24] . However, the implementation of these MIMO controllers (e.g., prediction control [20] or H ∞ control [25] ) often imposes offline computation and strict constraints in both simulations and experiments. For example, when forming the Hamilton function in the H ∞ control, the feedback factor is often formulated by using Riccati equation or algebraic iteration [25] , which increase the offline computation.…”
Section: Energy Dissipation Based Longitudinal and Lateral Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the implementation of these MIMO controllers (e.g., prediction control [20] or H ∞ control [25] ) often imposes offline computation and strict constraints in both simulations and experiments. For example, when forming the Hamilton function in the H ∞ control, the feedback factor is often formulated by using Riccati equation or algebraic iteration [25] , which increase the offline computation. In addition, the control inputs need to be weighted for the MIMO controllers and the convergence of iterative approximate solution is not always guaranteed.…”
Section: Energy Dissipation Based Longitudinal and Lateral Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the previous researches, there has been a large collection of papers on ACC systems aimed at highways [1][2][3][4][5], but only a few researches have paid attention to the Stop & Go system used for the city traffic condition [6][7][8][9]. The research on combining the ACC system with the Stop & Go systems has not been extensively discussed until recently [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is implemented by neglecting the powertrain dynamics. For the uncertainties, the majority rely on robust control techniques, including sliding model control (SMC) [19], H ∞ control [20,21], adaptive control [22][23][24], fuzzy control [25,26], etc. Considering parametric variations, an adaptive SMC was designed by Swaroop et al [19] by adding an on-line estimator for vehicle parameters, such as mass, aerodynamic drag coefficient and rolling resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering parametric variations, an adaptive SMC was designed by Swaroop et al [19] by adding an on-line estimator for vehicle parameters, such as mass, aerodynamic drag coefficient and rolling resistance. Higashimata and Adachi [20] and Yamamura and Seto [21] designed a Model Matching Controller (MMC) based controller for headway control. This design used an H ∞ controller as feedback and a forward compensator for a faster response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%