2015
DOI: 10.1002/nme.5183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An accelerated, convergent, and stable nodal integration in Galerkin meshfree methods for linear and nonlinear mechanics

Abstract: Summary Convergent and stable domain integration that is also computationally efficient remains a challenge for Galerkin meshfree methods. High order quadrature can achieve stability and optimal convergence, but it is prohibitively expensive for practical use. On the other hand, low order quadrature consumes much less CPU but can yield non‐convergent, unstable solutions. In this work, an accelerated, convergent, and stable nodal integration is developed for the reproducing kernel particle method. A stabilizati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(160 reference statements)
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the community of mesh free methods, two well-established families are available for the consideration of numerical stabilisation, namely gradient based stabilisation [23] and the strain smoothing procedure [65,66]. Unfortunately, to the best of the authors' knowledge, most of the available stabilisation algorithms still suffer from non-physical pressure instabilities in highly nonlinear nearly incompressible scenarios [17,67].…”
Section: Globally Conservative Jameson-schmidt-turkel (Jst) Stabilisamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the community of mesh free methods, two well-established families are available for the consideration of numerical stabilisation, namely gradient based stabilisation [23] and the strain smoothing procedure [65,66]. Unfortunately, to the best of the authors' knowledge, most of the available stabilisation algorithms still suffer from non-physical pressure instabilities in highly nonlinear nearly incompressible scenarios [17,67].…”
Section: Globally Conservative Jameson-schmidt-turkel (Jst) Stabilisamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NMAP naturally models large deformations that include material fragmentation of the experiments described in the previous section because the RKPM framework has no need for ad hoc failure models such as element erosion that are necessary for the finite element method to model perforation (Guan et al and Yreux and Chen). For this class of problems, naturally stabilized nodal integration (Hillman and Chen,) is introduced to reduce spatial instabilities that govern the effects of debris and fragmentation experienced in these dynamic events. Quasi‐linear kernels on the support are proposed by Yreux and Chen, to ensure the stability of the model.…”
Section: Validation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of flexibility in numerical resolution may result in high computational cost in large‐scale problems with fine grain size. On the other hand, continuum‐based Lagrangian particle meshless methods, for example, smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH), reproducing kernel particle method (RKPM), and material point method (MPM), can easily model large soil deformations and moving boundaries. This is because they are based on Lagrangian formulations so there is no need to track the interfaces and moving boundaries, and owing to the meshless nature, they do not suffer from the instabilities induced by mesh distortion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%