SAE Technical Paper Series 2012
DOI: 10.4271/2012-01-0174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Accurate, Extensive, and Rapid Method for Aerodynamics Optimization: The 50:50:50 Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimization engine employed took 183 parameters (61 coordinate points times 3 axis values) to define each bucket surface and run the simulation of 0.075 seconds within 1 minute. 50 generations with 48 individuals each took a total of 2400 minutes to complete which is very fast solution rate as compared to the traditional optimization attempts made with CFD which would take 50 hours to complete analysing only 50 parameters [9]. The resulting bucket surface showed a 13.21 percentage improvement in efficiency.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimization engine employed took 183 parameters (61 coordinate points times 3 axis values) to define each bucket surface and run the simulation of 0.075 seconds within 1 minute. 50 generations with 48 individuals each took a total of 2400 minutes to complete which is very fast solution rate as compared to the traditional optimization attempts made with CFD which would take 50 hours to complete analysing only 50 parameters [9]. The resulting bucket surface showed a 13.21 percentage improvement in efficiency.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RBF mesh morphing technique is the core technology of the RBF4AERO Project (European commission, 2013) which had the purpose to develop the RBF4AERO Benchmark Technology, namely, an integrated numerical platform and methodology to efficiently face the most demanding challenges of aircraft design and optimisation, such as FSI (Biancolini et al , 2016b; Andrejašič et al , 2016) and EA methods (Biancolini et al , 2016a). The project was a great opportunity to further boost and extend mesh morphing in the aviation sector after receiving acknowledgments in other industrial fields such as automotive (Khondge and Sovani, 2012), motorsport (Petrone et al , 2014), nautical (Biancolini et al , 2014; Viola et al , 2015), road infrastructures (Telenta et al , 2015) and medical (Biancolini et al , 2012).…”
Section: Radial Basis Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been many studies on the automatic optimization of the automotive aerodynamic shape worldwide. [5][6][7] The technology is mature but has been rarely applied to modeling in the early stage of vehicle design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%