All Days 2011
DOI: 10.2118/149086-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Accurate Prediction of CO2 Minimum Miscibility Pressure (MMP) Using Alternating Conditional Expectation Algorithm (ACE)

Abstract: Miscible gas injection nowadays becomes an imperative enhanced oil recovery (EOR) approach for increasing oil recovery. Due to the massive cost associated with this approach a high degree of accuracy is required for predicting the outcome of the process. Such accuracy includes, the preliminary screening parameters for gas miscible displacement; the "minimum miscibility pressure" (MMP) and the availability of the gas. All conventional and stat-of-the-art MMP measurement methods are either time consuming or deci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The non-parametric metamodel was created using the Alternating Conditional Expectations(ACE)algorithm (Sato, 2000;Alomair, 2011) . The ACE algorithm (Breiman and Friedman, 1985)involves backfitting, iteration, smoothing, and standardizing processes.…”
Section: Metamodelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-parametric metamodel was created using the Alternating Conditional Expectations(ACE)algorithm (Sato, 2000;Alomair, 2011) . The ACE algorithm (Breiman and Friedman, 1985)involves backfitting, iteration, smoothing, and standardizing processes.…”
Section: Metamodelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical modifiers appear to have the potential to improve the economics of miscible floods significantly. Application of a slim tube apparatus for the establishment of MMP requirements for condensing or vaporizing gas drives was presented and referred to these systems as conditionally miscible processes . Studies shed light on the ways in which C 1 , C 2 , C 3 , or C 4 concentrations affect miscibility pressure by monitoring recovery from slim tube or core tests and were important for understanding the compositional relationships between the injected gas and oil in the hydrocarbon multi‐contact miscible process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%