W ithin neurosurgery, the national mandate of the 2003 duty hour restrictions (DHR) by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has been controversial at best. Ensuring the proper education, training, socialization, and psychological well-being of residents while fulfilling our primary purpose of patient care has generated an 11-year debate. Many of the formal medical disciplines have studied the effects that DHR have had on resident education and have developed strategies to address the often conflicting needs of education and service. These studies are, for the most part, cross-sectional studies at single institutions, and, although they provide insight into the controversy, they are not specifically relevant to the needs of a neurosurgical residency or a busy neurosurgical service. The recent implementation of the 2011 DHR specifically aimed at limiting interns to 16-hour duty shifts has proven to be more controversial and challenging across the nation for neurosurgical residencies-again bringing education and service needs into conflict.Each medical specialty is unique-although there is overlap in ideology and there is commonality in that all are composed of physicians. With this uniqueness come needs and demands that are not transposable across specialties. We believe that a one-size-fits-all approach to residency training mandated by the ACGME is not appropriate for the training of neurological surgery residents. In our opinion, an arbitrary and artificial timeline designed to limit resident fatigue limits patient care and technical training of neurosurgical residents, and has not improved patient safety. We will touch upon the topics of fatigue, technical training, and patient safety relative to the DHR as they specifically regard neurosurgical training, and review the literature relevant to these issues as they pertain to neurosurgical training, in the first review on this topic since the implementation of the 2011 DHR. Novel studies reviewed abbreviatioNs ACGME = Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education; DHR = duty hour restrictions; OR = operating room. Within neurosurgery, the national mandate of the 2003 duty hour restrictions (DHR) by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has been controversial. Ensuring the proper education and psychological well-being of residents while fulfilling the primary purpose of patient care has generated much debate. Most medical disciplines have developed strategies that address service needs while meeting educational goals. Additionally, there are numerous studies from those disciplines; however, they are not specifically relevant to the needs of a neurosurgical residency. The recent implementation of the 2011 DHR specifically aimed at limiting interns to 16-hour duty shifts has proven controversial and challenging across the nation for neurosurgical residencies-again bringing education and service needs into conflict. In this report the current literature on DHR is reviewed, with special attention paid to n...