2005
DOI: 10.1115/1.1988367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Acoustic Model for Wave Propagation in a Weak Layer

Abstract: An acoustic model is developed for transient wave propagation in a weak layer excited by prescribed pressure or prescribed acceleration at the boundary. The validity of the acoustic model is investigated for the two excitations. A comparison of transient response from the acoustic model and a 3D axisymmetric elastic model reveals that for prescribed acceleration the acoustic model fails to capture important features of the elastic model even as Poisson ratio ν approaches 1∕2. However for prescribed pressure, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The r dil response of first arrival retains the character of waves in a solid in that dispersion attenuates stress peaks with distance traveled. The p response of first arrival retains the character of waves in a fluid typified by a sharp unattenuated pre-curser followed by a narrow plateau whose magnitude attenuates with distance (El-Raheb, 2005). At r = r i , r dil in the solid cylinder is approximately three times higher than p in the fluid-filled cylinder (Fig.…”
Section: Plain-strain Modelmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The r dil response of first arrival retains the character of waves in a solid in that dispersion attenuates stress peaks with distance traveled. The p response of first arrival retains the character of waves in a fluid typified by a sharp unattenuated pre-curser followed by a narrow plateau whose magnitude attenuates with distance (El-Raheb, 2005). At r = r i , r dil in the solid cylinder is approximately three times higher than p in the fluid-filled cylinder (Fig.…”
Section: Plain-strain Modelmentioning
confidence: 88%